Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Supreme CourtAllowedPetition 47 of 2019

Geo Chem Middle East v Kenya Bureau of Standards

Supreme Court of Kenya
23 September 2020
618 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya LawDownload the judgment (PDF) Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Court grants extension to file appeal due to slow court processes, not applicant's fault.

What this practically means

#

The Supreme Court allowed an application to file a Supplementary Record of Appeal late. The delay happened because the applicant could not get the Judge's notes on time due to slow court administration. The court found this was a reasonable excuse and that the other side would not be unfairly harmed. The applicant must file the documents within three days, and each side pays its own costs.

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling on a Notice of Motion by the Appellant/Applicant dated 11th September 2020, seeking extension of time to file a Supplementary Record of Appeal. The application was brought under Rule 40(4) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2010. The Appellant/Applicant argued that the delay was caused by the inability to obtain Judges' notes, which were not available at the time of filing the appeal, and that three letters were inadvertently omitted from the Record of Appeal. The Respondent opposed the application, contending that it was incompetent as the documents sought to be admitted were not annexed, the record was jumbled, and the letters were deliberately excluded to prejudice the Respondent's case. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, allowed the application. The Court found the explanation for the delay reasonable, noting that the failure to obtain Judges' notes timeously could not be blamed on the Appellant/Applicant but on slow administrative Court processes. The Court also found no prejudice to the Respondent as the three letters had been in its custody in the lower court proceedings. The Court ordered that the Supplementary Record of Appeal be filed and served within 3 days, and that each party bear its own costs. The ruling was delivered on 23rd September 2020 by a five-judge bench comprising Deputy Chief Justice P. M. Mwilu and Justices M. K. Ibrahim, S. C. Wanjala, Njoki Ndungu, and I. Lenaola.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the Appellant/Applicant has given sufficient reasons for the delay in filing the Supplementary Record of Appeal
  2. 2.Whether the application for extension of time should be granted

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Appellant/Applicant provided sufficient reasons for the delay in filing the Supplementary Record of Appeal.

Holding

Yes, the explanation given by the Appellant/Applicant is reasonable.

Reasoning

The Court found that the delay was occasioned by the inability to obtain Judges' notes, which were not available at the time of filing the appeal, and that three letters were inadvertently omitted from the Record of Appeal. The Court noted that the failure to obtain Judges' notes timeously could not be blamed on the Appellant/Applicant but on slow administrative Court processes. Additionally, the Court saw no prejudice to the Respondent as the three letters sought to be admitted had been in its custody in proceedings before the Superior Courts below.

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant for extension of time must give sufficient reasons for any delay.
  • The length of delay is an important factor in the court's decision to grant or deny extension.
  • Delay caused by slow administrative court processes is not the applicant's fault.
  • No prejudice to the other party supports granting an extension of time.
  • Each party bears its own costs unless there is a reason to order otherwise.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion by the Appellant/Applicant dated 11th September 2020 and filed on 14th September 2020 is hereby allowed
  2. 2.The Supplementary Record of Appeal shall be filed and served within 3 days of this Ruling
  3. 3.Each party shall bear its costs

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

Philomena Mbete Mwilu
P. M. MwiluDCJ
Currently serving
majority
majority
Smokin Charles Wanjala
S. C. WanjalaSCJ
Currently serving
majority
Njoki Susanna Ndungu
Njoki NdunguSCJ
Currently serving
majority
Isaac Lenaola
I. LenaolaSCJ
Currently serving
majority
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 40(4) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2010

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

The Notice of Motion by the Appellant/Applicant dated 11th September 2020 and filed on 14th September 2020 is hereby allowed
p. 3 final orders
the principles for grant of an order of extension of time are that an Applicant must give sufficient reasons for any delay and that the period of delay is nonetheless an important consideration in the Court’s exercise of discretion to grant or deny the extension
p. 3 extension of time
failure to obtain Judges’ notes timeously cannot be blamed on the Appellant/Applicant but on slow administrative Court processes
p. 3 reasonable explanation for delay

Key timeline

#
2020-09-11
Appellant/Applicant files Notice of Motion seeking extension of time to file Supplementary Record of Appeal.
2020-09-14
Notice of Motion is filed in the Supreme Court.
2020-09-23
Supreme Court delivers ruling allowing the application.

Practical implications

#
For lawyers

Use court delays as excuse

When seeking extension of time, clearly document that the delay was due to slow court processes (e.g., obtaining judges' notes). This ruling shows the Supreme Court accepts such reasons as reasonable. Attach evidence of your requests to the court registry to strengthen your application.

For businesses

Court delays won't hurt your case

If you miss a filing deadline because the court system was slow (e.g., you couldn't get required documents), you can ask for more time. The court will consider your explanation fairly. However, act quickly once you get the documents—you only have 3 days to file after the extension is granted.

For individuals

Don't be penalized for court slowness

If you are appealing a case and the court itself causes a delay (like not providing judges' notes on time), you can apply for extra time to file your documents. The Supreme Court will not blame you for such delays. But you must explain the reason clearly in your application and show you acted in good faith.

Frequently asked questions

#
Can I get an extension of time to file an appeal in Kenya if the court caused the delay?+

Yes. The Supreme Court ruled that if the delay is due to slow administrative court processes (like getting judges' notes), that is a reasonable excuse. You must apply for extension and explain the reason clearly.

What happens if I miss a filing deadline in a Kenyan appeal?+

You can file an application for extension of time under Rule 40(4) of the Supreme Court Rules. The court will consider your reasons for delay and whether the other side will be prejudiced. If your reasons are reasonable, the court may grant the extension.

Does the other party have to pay my costs if I win an extension of time in Kenya?+

Not necessarily. In this case, the court ordered each party to bear its own costs. This means you pay your own legal fees even if you win the extension. The court has discretion on costs.

How long do I have to file documents after getting an extension in the Supreme Court of Kenya?+

The court will specify the deadline in its order. In this case, the applicant had to file the Supplementary Record of Appeal within 3 days of the ruling. Always check the court's order for the exact timeline.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Geo Chem Middle East v Kenya Bureau of Standards", Case Analysis (2020). Petition 47 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.orghttps://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kesc/2020/12/eng@2020-09-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.