Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Supreme CourtStruck OutReference 1 of 2013· [2014] KESC 42 (KLR)

In re National Gender and Equality Commission (Reference 1 of 2013)

Supreme Court of Kenya
27 March 2014
6,086 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya LawDownload the judgment (PDF) Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~24 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Supreme Court can give advisory opinions but won't if issues are already in lower courts.

What this practically means

#

The National Gender and Equality Commission asked the Supreme Court for an advisory opinion on representation of special interests in county assemblies. The Court said it has the power to give such opinions, but it will not do so when the same issues are already being handled by lower courts. The Commission should have appealed through the normal court system instead of asking for an advisory opinion. The case was therefore struck out.

Executive summary

#
This was a reference by the National Gender and Equality Commission seeking an advisory opinion from the Supreme Court under Article 163(6) of the Constitution on twelve issues concerning the representation of special interests in Parliament and county assemblies. The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) raised a preliminary objection challenging the Court's jurisdiction, arguing that the applicant had not sought the Attorney-General's opinion and that the issues had already been determined by the High Court and Court of Appeal. The Attorney-General supported the objection, submitting that while the Court had jurisdiction, this was not an appropriate case for an advisory opinion. The Supreme Court held that it had jurisdiction because the applicant was a state organ and the matter concerned county government, satisfying the two paramount considerations. However, the Court declined to exercise its discretion, noting that the issues had been substantially litigated in lower courts and the applicant had withdrawn some issues for that reason. The Court emphasized that its advisory-opinion jurisdiction is discretionary and should not be used to bypass the normal appellate process or usurp the High Court's primary role in constitutional interpretation. The preliminary objection was upheld, the reference was struck out, and each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to render an advisory opinion under Article 163(6) of the Constitution.

Holding

The Court has jurisdiction under Article 163(6) to issue an advisory opinion at the request of a state organ on a matter concerning county government.

Reasoning

The Court confirmed that the applicant, a state organ, had locus standi, and the subject-matter concerned county government, thus satisfying the two paramount considerations for jurisdiction. However, jurisdiction is discretionary and not all cases qualify for an advisory opinion.

02

Whether the Court should exercise its discretion to render an advisory opinion where the issues have been substantially determined by lower courts.

Holding

The Court declined to exercise its discretion because the issues had been litigated in the High Court and Court of Appeal, and the applicant should have pursued review or appeal rather than an advisory opinion.

Reasoning

The Court noted that the applicant had withdrawn some issues because they had been determined in lower courts, and the remaining issues were also covered by those decisions. The Court held that allowing the reference would circumvent the normal appellate hierarchy and usurp the High Court's primary jurisdiction to interpret the Constitution.

Legal principles established

#
  • The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to give advisory opinions on county government matters when requested by a state organ.
  • The Court's advisory opinion power is discretionary, not automatic.
  • Parties cannot use advisory opinions to bypass the normal appeal process in lower courts.
  • It is good practice to first seek the Attorney-General's advice before asking the Supreme Court for an advisory opinion.
  • The High Court has primary jurisdiction to interpret the Constitution, and the Supreme Court will not usurp that role.
  • If issues have already been decided by lower courts, the Supreme Court will decline to give an advisory opinion.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection by the IEBC is upheld in its entirety.
  2. 2.The reference is struck out.
  3. 3.Each party to bear its own costs.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 163(6)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 59(4)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 27
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 97(1)(c)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 98(1)(b), (c) and (d)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 177(1)(b) and (c)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 90
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 10
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 165(3)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 156
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 176(1)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 164(3)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 191
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 159
  • National Gender and Equality Commission Act, 2011Section 8
  • National Gender and Equality Commission Act, 2011Section 8(a)(b)(c)(d) and (e)
  • Supreme Court Act, 2011Section 13
  • Supreme Court Act, 2011Section 3(c)
  • Supreme Court RulesRule 41(1)
  • Supreme Court RulesRule 41(4)(c)
  • County Government Act, 2012Section 7(1)(b)
  • County Government Act, 2012Section 7(1)(a)
  • County Government Act, 2012Section 7
  • Elections Act, 2011Section 36(1)(f)

Cases cited (10)

  • Commission for Implementation of the Constitution v the Attorney-General and Others
    Civil Application No.14 of 2013
  • Ben Njoroge & others
    High Court Election Petition No. 14 of 2013
  • National Gender and Equality Commission v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission and Others
    High Court Petition No. 147 of 2013
  • In The Matter of the IEBC
    Application No. 2 of 2011
  • Republic v Transitional Authority & 4 Others Ex parte Crispus Fwamba & Benjamin Hinga Njeri
    Judicial Review Application No. 110 of 2013
  • Commissioner for the Implementation of the Constitution v Attorney-General & Another
    Civil Appeal No. 351 of 2013
  • Micah Kigen and 2 Others v Attorney-General and 2 Others
    Nairobi Petition No. 268 and 398 of 2012 [2012] eKLR
  • In the Matter of the Senate
    Advisory Opinion No. 2 of 2013
  • Advisory Opinion No. 2/2012
  • In Re Matter of the Interim Independent Electoral Commission
    Constitutional Application 2 of 2011
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 163(6) of the Constitution

Key timeline

#
2014
National Gender and Equality Commission files reference seeking Supreme Court advisory opinion on 12 issues about special interest representation.
2014
IEBC raises preliminary objection, arguing the Court lacks jurisdiction and issues were already decided by lower courts.
2014
Supreme Court upholds IEBC's objection, strikes out the reference, and orders each party to bear its own costs.

Practical implications

#
For lawyers

Use advisory opinions strategically

When advising state organs, ensure the matter is not already pending or decided in lower courts. If it is, advise clients to pursue appeal or review instead. Also recommend seeking the Attorney-General's opinion first as a best practice, though not mandatory.

For businesses

Understand court hierarchy limits

If your business is involved in a constitutional dispute with a county government, know that the Supreme Court will not give a shortcut advisory opinion if the case is already in lower courts. You must follow the normal appeal route from the High Court to the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court.

For individuals

Follow the right court process

If you have a legal issue about county government or representation, start at the High Court. You cannot skip levels by asking the Supreme Court for an advisory opinion. The Court only gives such opinions in special cases where no other court has dealt with the matter.

Frequently asked questions

#
Can the Supreme Court of Kenya give advisory opinions?+

Yes, under Article 163(6) of the Constitution, the Supreme Court can give advisory opinions on county government matters when requested by a state organ. But the Court decides whether to accept each request.

What happens if my case is already in a lower court in Kenya?+

The Supreme Court will likely refuse to give an advisory opinion if your issues are already being handled by the High Court or Court of Appeal. You must follow the normal appeal process instead.

Do I need to ask the Attorney-General before going to the Supreme Court in Kenya?+

It is not legally required, but the Supreme Court says it is good practice to first seek the Attorney-General's advice before asking for an advisory opinion.

What is the difference between an advisory opinion and an appeal in Kenya?+

An advisory opinion is a request for the Court's guidance on a legal question, not a dispute between parties. An appeal challenges a lower court's decision. The Supreme Court prefers appeals over advisory opinions when a case has already been decided.

Later judgments citing this (2)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "In re National Gender and Equality Commission (Reference 1 of 2013)", Case Analysis (2014). Reference 1 of 2013. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.orghttps://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kesc/2014/42/eng@2014-03-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.