Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCriminal Appeal 28 of 1994· [1995] KECA 52 (KLR)

GABRIEL KARIAMBURI MURAYA v REPUBLIC [1995] KECA 52 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
31 March 1995
387 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that a second criminal appeal can only challenge points of law, not facts or sentence severity.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a second appeal against conviction for robbery under section 296(1) of the Penal Code, arising from a conviction recorded on 29 January 1988 and an unsuccessful first appeal to the High Court at Nairobi (Porter J. and Mbaluto J.), whose decision dated 1 October 1990 was under review. The appellant, through Mr. Wandugi, argued alleged major discrepancies and contradictions in the prosecution evidence and complained of an allegedly excessive sentence of ten years' imprisonment with ten strokes and five years of police supervision. The Court of Appeal (Gachuhi, Tunoi and Shah JJA, in a single judgment of the court) held that section 361(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code bars a second appeal on matters of fact and expressly treats the severity of a sentence as a matter of fact. Noting that both courts below had properly considered the issues of fact, including the discrepancies relied upon, the court found no discrepancy entitling it to inquire into the facts and held there were facts justifying the conviction. The appeal was dismissed in its entirety on 31 March 1995. The judgment reaffirms the well-established limitation that a second appeal lies only on matters of law and that sentence severity is not open to challenge on second appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Scope of a second appeal under section 361(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code

Holding

A second appeal is confined to matters of law; the court cannot revisit findings of fact by the two courts below, nor the severity of a sentence, which is a matter of fact.

Reasoning

The court held that section 361(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly bars a second appeal on matters of fact, and expressly treats the severity of a sentence as a matter of fact. Since both the trial magistrate and the first appellate judges had properly considered the evidence, including the alleged discrepancies, the Court of Appeal could not take a different view of the facts.

p. 1
02

Alleged discrepancies and contradictions in prosecution evidence

Holding

The discrepancies relied upon did not undermine the credibility of the prosecution witnesses and did not open a factual inquiry for the second appellate court.

Reasoning

Counsel relied on what he termed major discrepancies and contradictions in the prosecution evidence. The court noted that the first appellate judges had properly considered the discrepancies and concluded the whole of the evidence supported the two duty watchmen, leaving their credit unaffected. The court found no discrepancy justifying an inquiry into the facts, as the facts justified the conviction.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • On a second appeal under section 361(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Court of Appeal cannot entertain matters of fact, including severity of sentence, which are matters of fact.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
H.C.CR. A. No. 170 of 1988
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 361(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "GABRIEL KARIAMBURI MURAYA v REPUBLIC [1995] KECA 52 (KLR)", Case Analysis (1995). Criminal Appeal 28 of 1994. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/1995/52/eng@1995-03-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.