Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Appeal No. 194 of 1998· [1999] KECA 174 (KLR)

Nathalal Monji Rai Shantaben Nathalal Monji Rai Biharlal Nathalal Rai Jagdish Nathalal Rai Dharmendra Nathalal Rai Industrial Hardware (kenya) Ltd v Standard Chartered Bank Kenya Ltd

Court of Appeal
26 March 1999
913 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that 'liberty to apply' clauses cannot reopen a consent order, and defaulting borrowers cannot block mortgage sales.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Court of Appeal (Gicheru, Kwach and Lakha, JJ.A.) dismissed an appeal against a ruling of Kuloba J dated 1st July 1998 in H.C.C.C. No. 577 of 1997. Standard Chartered Bank Kenya Ltd had lent Industrial Hardware (Kenya) Ltd Shs 16,200,000 secured by a legal charge over a Nairobi property, personal guarantees of the five individual appellants, and a debenture. On default the bank moved to exercise its statutory power of sale. The plaintiffs sought an interim injunction, but on 22nd May 1997 a consent order was recorded before Kuloba J under which the plaintiffs were to pay Shs 17,000,000 within 100 days, with the disputed balance to be settled after accounts. The plaintiffs made no payment and instead filed repeated injunction applications whenever a sale was scheduled. On 1st July 1998 they revived the original injunction application, effectively asking the Judge to set aside the consent order; the application was dismissed and they appealed. The Court of Appeal held, following Cristel v Cristel [1951] 2 All ER 574, that a 'liberty to apply' clause does not confer a right to vary or set aside an order, and that no injunction could lie to restrain a mortgagee's statutory power of sale where default, indebtedness and due notices were undisputed. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the bank. This ruling binds subordinate courts and the High Court on both propositions.

Key legal issues

#
01

Effect of a 'liberty to apply' clause in a consent order

Holding

The clause does not entitle a party to apply to set aside or vary the consent order.

Reasoning

Adopting the English Court of Appeal decision in Cristel v Cristel, the court held that 'liberty to apply' means only that, when the order is drawn up, its working out may involve matters on which a decision of the court may be necessary. It confers no right to reopen or vary the order itself. Counsel's contrary submission was rejected as legally incorrect.

p. 2
02

Availability of an injunction to restrain exercise of a mortgagee's statutory power of sale

Holding

No injunction lies where default and indebtedness are not denied and the necessary notices have been served.

Reasoning

The court, referring to Halsbury's Laws of England, Volume 32 (4th Edition), paragraph 725, found no legal basis for restraining the mortgagee. The plaintiffs had defaulted on the loan secured by the charge and guarantees, had not complied with the consent order, and had pursued a strategy of filing frivolous injunction applications to frustrate the sale.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A 'liberty to apply' clause in an order does not confer any right to ask the court to vary or set aside the order; it applies only to matters arising in the working out of the order.
  • A mortgagor cannot obtain an injunction restraining a mortgagee from exercising its statutory power of sale where default and indebtedness are not denied and the necessary notices have been served.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the appeal to the defendant (Standard Chartered Bank Kenya Ltd)
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
H.C.C.C. No. 577 of 1997
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal to the Court of Appeal from the High Court (not expressly stated in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nathalal Monji Rai Shantaben Nathalal Monji Rai Biharlal Nathalal Rai Jagdish Nathalal Rai Dharmendra Nathalal Rai Industrial Hardware (kenya) Ltd v Standard Chartered Bank Kenya Ltd", Case Analysis (1999). Civil Appeal No. 194 of 1998. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/1999/174/eng@1999-03-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.