Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedCivil Application 213 of 2009· [2009] KECA 17 (KLR)

Court of Appeal v Asset Recovery Services Ltd & 1 other

Court of Appeal
18 December 2009
1,137 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal blocked the sale of a Kshs.100 million Nairobi property, ruling that the buyer's right to sell it was genuinely disputable.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-judgment-of-the-court ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi on an application dated 15th July 2009 under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court's Rules, seeking an injunction restraining the exercise of a chargee's statutory power of sale pending an intended appeal against a ruling of Kimaru, J dated 1st July 2009 in H.C.C.C. No. 352 of 2009, which had dismissed the applicant's application for a temporary injunction. The applicant (the legal representative of the deceased guarantor, Gopal Ramji Patel) challenged the 1st respondent's entitlement to exercise the statutory power of sale over LR 209/45/6 Nairobi, charged to City Finance Ltd, on the ground that an assignee of book debts under a deed of assignment, in whose favour the charge had not been transferred, could not exercise a chargee's power of sale under section 69 of the Transfer of Property Act. Applying the two-limb rule 5(2)(b) test, the Court held the appeal arguable, since whether an assignment can confer the chargee's power of sale without actual transfer of the charge under the Registration of Titles Act was not frivolous. On the nugatory limb, the Court found the property worth about Kshs.100 million, that the respondent had not shown means to compensate, that the chargee was not a party and received no notice of appeal, and that the deed of assignment contained no indemnity. The Court allowed the application, granting an injunction in terms of prayer one, with costs of the motion in the intended appeal. The decision binds subordinate courts and the High Court on the rule 5(2)(b) threshold.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an assignee of book debts under a deed of assignment can exercise a chargee's statutory power of sale without the charge itself being transferred

Holding

The Court found this a triable, arguable issue - it did not decide it finally, only that it was not frivolous.

Reasoning

The applicant contended that a deed of assignment of actionable claims does not vest the charge conferring the power of sale in the assignee. The respondent relied on section 69D of the Transfer of Property Act, arguing the power may be exercised by one entitled to receive and give discharge. The Court held that, given the charge was registered under the Registration of Titles Act, the question was not frivolous.

p. 2
02

Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory if the power of sale were exercised

Holding

Yes - the appeal might be rendered nugatory because the respondent did not demonstrate means to repay the property value or damages, and the chargee was not a party to the suit.

Reasoning

The property was valued at approximately Kshs.100 million. The respondent's affidavit did not demonstrate sufficient means to repay that value or damages for wrongful sale. The chargee, City Finance Ltd, was not a party and no notice of appeal was served on it, and the deed of assignment provided no indemnity to the assignee for exercising the power of sale.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant under rule 5(2)(b) must demonstrate both an arguable appeal and that the appeal would be rendered nugatory if successful.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An injunction granted in terms of prayer one (1) of the application dated 15th July, 2009
  2. 2.Costs of the motion to be in the intended appeal
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi, Milimani Commercial Courts
H.C.C.C. No. 352 of 2009
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Court of Appeal v Asset Recovery Services Ltd & 1 other", Case Analysis (2009). Civil Application 213 of 2009. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2009/17/eng@2009-12-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.