Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedCivil Appeal No. 316 of 2006 (application under Rule 96)· [2010] KECA 28 (KLR)

Elizabeth Amaiza v Jackson Sabatia Natse & 3 others [2010] KECA 28 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
2 December 2010
235 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal allowed a deceased respondent to be replaced by her estate's administrator, confirming applications under Rule 96 must be filed within 12 months of death.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a single-judge application before the Court of Appeal at Kisumu under Rule 96 of the Court of Appeal Rules, seeking the substitution of the 1st respondent in Civil Appeal No. 316 of 2006, Elizabeth Amaiza (deceased), by William Shivachi Miheso, the administrator of her estate. Although all respondents were served with the application and hearing notice, none filed a replying affidavit or attended the hearing, leaving the application unopposed. The court verified from the certificate of death annexed to the supporting affidavit that 'Sabeti Amaiza' died on 7th October 1979, and that a grant of letters of administration over the estate was issued to the applicant on 19th March 2010. The applicant deposed that 'Sabeti Amaiza' and 'Elizabeth Amaiza' referred to one and the same person. The application was filed on 9th April 2010, within the 12-month limitation period prescribed by Rule 96(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The court found the application competent and allowed it, substituting the applicant as a party in the appeal in place of the deceased 1st respondent, with costs in the appeal. The decision is interlocutory in nature and does not disturb any decision below; the underlying appeal remains to be heard.

Key legal issues

#
01

Competency of a Rule 96 substitution application where the death certificate bears a different name from the party on record

Holding

Evidence of identity by affidavit, coupled with an unopposed application and a grant of letters of administration, suffices to establish that the deceased party and the person named in the death certificate are the same.

Reasoning

The court relied on the certificate of death annexed to the supporting affidavit showing 'Sabeti Amaiza' died on 7th October 1979, and the grant of letters of administration issued to the applicant on 19th March 2010. The applicant deposed that 'Sabeti Amaiza' and 'Elizabeth Amaiza' were one and the same person. The respondents, though served, neither filed a replying affidavit nor attended the hearing, so the application was unopposed.

p. 1
02

Compliance with the limitation period in Rule 96(2)

Holding

The application filed on 9th April 2010 was within the 12-month limitation period stipulated in Rule 96(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules and was therefore competent.

Reasoning

The court verified the date of death (7th October 1979) from the certificate annexed to the supporting affidavit and the filing date of the application (9th April 2010), and was satisfied that the application fell within the 12-month period prescribed by Rule 96(2). The absence of opposition was also noted in concluding the application was competent.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An application to substitute a deceased party under Rule 96 must be filed within 12 months of the death, as stipulated by Rule 96(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.William Shivachi Miheso, administrator of the estate of Elizabeth Amaiza (deceased), is made a party in the appeal in place of the deceased 1st respondent
  2. 2.Costs of the application are awarded in the appeal
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 96 of the Court of Appeal Rules (substitution of a party on account of death)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Elizabeth Amaiza v Jackson Sabatia Natse & 3 others [2010] KECA 28 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2010). Civil Appeal No. 316 of 2006 (application under Rule 96). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2010/28/eng@2010-12-02

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.