Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedCivil Appeal No. 16 of 2016· [2019] KECA 13 (KLR)

Edward Njane Ng’ang’a & 1 other v Damaris Wanjiku Kamau & 1 other

Court of Appeal of Kenya
13 February 2019
2,615 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal cancelled a land title bought from a mother who sold inherited family land without her sons' consent, confirming customary trusts bind registered owners.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a second appeal in a family land dispute over parcel LOC 9/Kiruri/2095, a subdivision of LOC 9/Kiruri/206. The appellants, sons of Ruth Wanjiku Ng’ang’a, sued to invalidate her sale of the land to the respondents, claiming it was family land held in trust. The trial magistrate dismissed the suit, finding the sale above board, and Ombwayo, J. dismissed the first appeal. The Court of Appeal (Waki, Sichale and ole Kantai, JJ.A.) held that its jurisdiction on a second appeal was confined to issues of law, and identified the single live legal issue as whether the land was family land held in trust. Applying the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Isack M’Inanga Kiebia v Isaaya Theuri M’Lintari, the Court recognised that customary trusts are overriding interests binding registered proprietors, and that Obiero v Opiyo and Esiroyo v Esiroyo were wrongly decided. On the evidence — the mother's admission that the land was inherited land, and the registration in her name only following her husband's death in 2011 — the Court found this was family land and the mother had a legal duty to seek the appellants' consent before selling. The appeal was allowed: the title issued to the respondents was cancelled, the prior title reinstated, and the appellants were awarded costs of the appeal and below.

Key legal issues

#
01

Scope of the Court of Appeal's jurisdiction on a second appeal

Holding

The Court may consider only issues of law, not matters of fact already evaluated by the trial court and the first appellate court; however, failure by the courts below to consider relevant evidence raises a question of law.

Reasoning

Relying on Kenya Breweries Ltd v Godfrey Odoyo quoting Selle & Another v Associated Motor Boat Company Ltd, the Court held its mandate on second appeal excludes re-evaluation of facts. The single live issue of law identified was whether the land was family land held in trust, which the respondents' counsel conceded was a legal issue.

p. 2
02

Whether the disputed parcel was family land held in trust by the appellants' mother

Holding

The evidence established that the land was inherited family land; the mother, as registered proprietor, was bound by a customary/family trust and had a duty to seek the appellants' consent before selling.

Reasoning

The 2nd appellant testified the land was family land originally held by their grandfather in trust; the mother admitted the land was inherited land and had been registered only because her husband died in 2011. The trial magistrate considered only the title and sale, and the Judge erred in ignoring this evidence. The appellants had rights to inherit under the Law of Succession Act.

p. 3
03

Status of customary trusts as overriding interests under the land registration statutes

Holding

Following the Supreme Court's declaration in Isack M’Inanga Kiebia v Isaaya Theuri M’Lintari, customary trusts are overriding interests to which registered proprietors are subject, and the earlier decisions in Obiero v Opiyo and Esiroyo v Esiroyo were wrongly decided.

Reasoning

The Court adopted the Supreme Court's finding that the language of Section 117(2) of the retired Constitution was wrongly imported into Sections 27, 28 and 30 of the Registered Land Act, and that the elements of customary trust remain to be fully developed but are provable by evidence and bind first registration. Overriding interests under Section 30 of the repealed Registered Land Act are replicated in Section 28 of the Land Registration Act, 2012.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • On a second appeal the Court of Appeal is confined to matters of law and will not disturb concurrent findings of fact unless the courts below considered matters they should not have considered, failed to consider matters they should have considered, or the decision is perverse.
  • A customary trust, once proved, is an overriding interest binding a registered proprietor under the proviso to Section 28 of the Land Registration Act, and the categories of customary trust are not closed.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is allowed
  2. 2.The title issued after the sale of the land by Ruth Wanjiku Ng’ang’a to the respondents is cancelled
  3. 3.The title that existed before that transfer is reinstated
  4. 4.The appellants are awarded the costs of this appeal and the costs below
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nyeri
Civil Appeal No. 8 of 2013 (from Misc. Cause No. 44 of 2014 as cited in the header; the underlying first appeal was from Principal Magistrate’s Court at Kangema, Civil Case No. 124 of 2011)
Jurisdiction invoked
Second appeal limited to matters of law (appellate jurisdiction over second appeals from the High Court; mandate that this Court 'only consider issues of law but not matters of fact')

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Edward Njane Ng’ang’a & 1 other v Damaris Wanjiku Kamau & 1 other", Case Analysis (2019). Civil Appeal No. 16 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2019/13/eng@2019-02-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.