Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedCivil Application No. 48 of 2016

Kizito Savali v Marshalls East Africa Limited [2019] KECA 722 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
24 May 2019
1,051 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

If you file a notice of appeal in Kenya but don't file the full appeal record within 60 days, that notice dies automatically and can be struck out.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi (Githinji, Koome and ole Kantai, JJ.A.) on a motion dated 23rd February 2016 brought under rules 83 and 84 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2010 by Kizito Savali, seeking to strike out a Notice of Appeal dated 16th August 2013 lodged by Marshalls East Africa Limited against a judgment of the Industrial Court (Nderi, J.) delivered on 14th August 2013 in Cause No. 1264 of 2010, in which the respondent was ordered to pay money to the applicant. The applicant argued that the respondent breached a consent order of 16th April 2015 directing it to file a record of appeal within 45 days, and in any event failed to lodge a record of appeal within the 60 days required by the Rules, having lost interest in the appeal. The respondent's advocate could not explain the two law firms apparently on record or the failure to file the record, and asked the court to be guided by the interests of justice and not procedural technicalities. Applying MAE Properties Ltd v Joseph Kibe on the natural death of a notice of appeal after sixty days, and Martin Kabaya v David Mungania Kiambi on the imperative of timely justice, the court concluded that the respondent had lost interest in the intended appeal and that the notice of appeal had died a natural death. It struck out the Notice of Appeal and awarded the costs of the motion to the applicant. The judgment binds subordinate courts on the consequence of failing to lodge a record of appeal within the prescribed time.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the Notice of Appeal dated 16th August 2013 should be struck out on the ground that no record of appeal was filed within the prescribed 60 days or within the 45 days allowed by the consent order of 16th April 2015
  2. 2.Whether the respondent had lost interest in prosecuting the intended appeal
  3. 3.Whether the orders of stay of execution granted on 16th April 2015 should be discharged

Key legal issues

#
01

Effect of failure to file a record of appeal within 60 days

Holding

The notice of appeal dies a natural death after expiry of 60 days unless time is extended by lodgment of the appeal within 60 days or by operation of the proviso to Rule 82(1)

Reasoning

The court noted the Rules require a record of appeal to be filed within 60 days of lodgment of the Notice of Appeal. Here no record was filed within that period or at all, contrary to the Rules and to the consent order of 16th April 2015 requiring filing within 45 days. Adopting MAE Properties Ltd v Joseph Kibe, the court held the notice had lapsed.

p. 2
02

Lost interest and delay in appellate proceedings

Holding

Where a party sleeps on its appeal and complies with neither the Rules nor court orders, the court may conclude it has lost interest and strike out the notice of appeal

Reasoning

Relying on Martin Kabaya v David Mungania Kiambi, the court emphasized that justice must be concluded in a timely fashion and that delay burdens both litigants and the Judiciary. The respondent's counsel could not explain the non-filing of the record or the presence of two law firms on record, supporting the conclusion that the respondent had abandoned the appeal.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A notice of appeal lapses if the record of appeal is not filed within 60 days, subject to the proviso to Rule 82(1) on exclusion of time
  • A party who fails to comply with the Court of Appeal Rules and with orders as to time may have the notice of appeal struck out, particularly where it is evident they have lost interest in the appeal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Appeal dated 16th August 2013 is struck out
  2. 2.Costs of the motion granted to the applicant

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority
Martha Karambu Koome
M.K. KoomeJA
Currently serving
majority
majority
On appeal from
Industrial Court of Kenya at Nairobi
Cause No. 1264 of 2010
Jurisdiction invoked
Rules 83 and 84 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2010 (application to strike out a Notice of Appeal)

Relief refused

#

Alternative prayer to deem the Notice of Appeal as having been withdrawn

Moot once the court struck out the notice

Discharge of the orders of stay of execution granted on 16th April 2015

No express order in the ruling discharging the stay; only the Notice of Appeal was struck out and costs granted

p. 2

Costs

Costs of the motion granted to the applicant

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

We conclude that the respondent lost interest in the intended appeal and the notice of appeal lodged died a natural death. The same is struck out and we grant costs of the motion to the applicant.
p. 2Final orders - striking out the Notice of Appeal
“It is safe to say, therefore, that a notice of appeal dies a natural death after the expiry of sixty days unless its life should be sooner extended by lodgment of the appeal within 60 literal days, or such longer time as may still amount to 60 days by operation of the proviso to Rule 82(1) on exclusion.”
p. 2Life span of a Notice of Appeal under Rule 82
We note that it is required by the Rules of this Court that a record of appeal be filed within 60 days of the date when a Notice of Appeal was lodged. The record of appeal here was not lodged within 60 days or at all.
p. 2Non-compliance with Court of Appeal Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kizito Savali v Marshalls East Africa Limited [2019] KECA 722 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Civil Application No. 48 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2019/722/eng@2019-05-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.