Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedRule 5(2)(b) application in intended appeal (as stated in the judgment)· [2023] KECA 328 (KLR)

Titus Barasa Makhanu v Evans K Cheruiyot & 1 other

Court of Appeal
17 March 2023
1,085 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal refused to halt a High Court case, ruling the intended appeal had no arguable grounds and would not be harmed if proceedings continued.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi on a notice of motion dated October 5, 2022 by Titus Barasa Makhanu seeking a stay of proceedings in Nairobi HCACE Pet No 3 of 2022 before the High Court, pending his intended appeal against a ruling of Maina, J delivered on September 22, 2022 allowing the 1st respondent, Evans K. Cheruiyot, to amend his petition and notice of motion dated April 28, 2022. The application was brought under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules and was heard unopposed on November 30, 2022, the respondents having been served but not represented, though the 1st respondent had filed submissions. The applicant argued that a notice of motion is not a pleading capable of amendment and that the amended petition was not marked in red ink. The Court applied the settled twin principles under rule 5(2)(b): the applicant must establish both that the intended appeal is arguable and that it would be rendered nugatory absent stay, relying principally on Stanley Kang'ethe Kinyanjui v Tony Keter. On arguability, the Court was unpersuaded, noting that the judge had properly considered whether the amendment was necessary and introduced no new cause of action, and that the red-ink concern was answered by the fact that on the e-platform only black appears. On the nugatory limb, the Court held the appeal would not be rendered nugatory because this is an interlocutory appeal and the applicant retains a right of appeal if the trial court finds against him. Having failed both limbs, the motion was dismissed with costs on March 17, 2023, before SichaLe, Laibuta and Achode, JJA, in a single judgment of the court.

Key legal issues

#
01

Arguability of the intended appeal against the amendment of pleadings

Holding

The applicant failed the arguability limb

Reasoning

The learned judge considered whether the amendment was necessary for the determination of the real issues and found it introduced no new cause of action. On the red-ink requirement, she noted that on the e-platform the colour that appears is black. Taking the amendment principles into account, the Court saw no arguable ground, while saying no more to avoid embarrassing the bench seized of the main appeal.

p. 3
02

Whether the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory absent stay

Holding

It would not

Reasoning

The Court reasoned that the intended appeal concerns an interlocutory ruling on amendment, and if the trial court ultimately finds against the applicant, he retains a right of appeal against that outcome. The proceedings continuing therefore do not render the appeal nugatory, and the nugatory limb failed as well.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant under rule 5(2)(b) must establish both arguability of the intended appeal and that the appeal will be rendered nugatory absent stay
  • An interlocutory appeal such as this is not rendered nugatory where the applicant retains a right of appeal on the outcome of the trial court's decision

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Dismissal of the notice of motion dated October 5, 2022
  2. 2.Costs to the respondents
On appeal from
High Court
Nairobi HCACE Pet No 3 of 2022
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Titus Barasa Makhanu v Evans K Cheruiyot & 1 other", Case Analysis (2023). Rule 5(2)(b) application in intended appeal (as stated in the judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2023/328/eng@2023-03-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.