Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedNot stated in the judgment· [2024] KECA 170 (KLR)

Esther Nyawira Mucunu v John Mwangi Kariuki

Court of Appeal
23 February 2024
696 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal refused to block an eviction because the landowner never filed a notice of appeal or draft grounds showing what she wanted to challenge.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant, Esther Nyawira Mucunu, moved the Court of Appeal by Motion under Rules 5(2)(b) and 42 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022 (and, incorrectly, Order 3 Rule 9A of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010, which the court held inapplicable in that Court) seeking an injunction restraining the respondent, John Mwangi Kimani, from evicting her from Plot No. 3/121 (L.R. No. Nairobi/Block 178/1027), or taking possession of, alienating, disposing of or selling it, pending the hearing of the application and an intended appeal. The Environment and Land Court, in a judgment by Mutungi, J. delivered in July 2020, had dismissed the applicant's case, and by a ruling dated 12th October 2023 the ELC ordered her to vacate the land within 90 days or face eviction. The court restated the twin test for such applications: the applicant must show the appeal is arguable and that it would be rendered nugatory absent relief. The court found no notice of appeal had been lodged against the ruling of 12th October 2023 that the Motion sought to challenge - the existing notice of appeal related only to the 2020 judgment - and no draft memorandum of appeal was attached, so nothing was shown to be arguable. The mere fact of an eviction order by the ELC could not suffice. The Motion was dismissed with no order as to costs, the respondent having filed no replying affidavit. The application was decided by a single judgment of the full bench of Warsame, ole Kantai and Nyamweya, JJA, delivered at Nairobi on 23rd February 2024. The decision is interlocutory and binds no lower court beyond its own facts, but restates the familiar twin-test standard for relief under Rule 5(2)(b).

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the applicant satisfied the twin test for relief under Rule 5(2)(b)

Holding

The Motion failed because the applicant neither lodged a notice of appeal against the ruling being challenged nor attached a draft memorandum of appeal, so no arguable appeal was demonstrated.

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant's notice of appeal was against a 2020 judgment, not the 12th October 2023 ruling which the Motion sought to challenge. Without a notice of appeal against that ruling and without a draft memorandum of appeal showing the intended grounds, the applicant could not show an arguable appeal or give the court any reason to issue an injunction. The mere fact that the ELC had ordered eviction did not suffice.

p. 2
02

Proper procedural vehicle for such applications in the Court of Appeal

Holding

Order 3 Rule 9A of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010 has no application in the Court of Appeal; relief is sought under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022. Grounds of Opposition have no place in the rules of the Court.

Reasoning

The applicant cited Order 3 Rule 9A of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010, but the court stated that provision has no application in the Court of Appeal, whose jurisdiction to issue injunctions in appropriate cases is donated by Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022. The court also noted that the respondent's Grounds of Opposition have no place in the rules of the Court.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant under Rule 5(2)(b) must demonstrate that the appeal or intended appeal is arguable (not frivolous) and that it would be rendered nugatory absent stay or relief.
  • A notice of appeal must be lodged against the specific decision challenged on appeal, and the applicant must show what will be argued on appeal (e.g. via a draft memorandum); a mere order of eviction by the lower court does not itself justify an injunction.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Motion is dismissed
  2. 2.No order on costs, the respondent not having filed a replying affidavit
On appeal from
Environment and Land Court
Not stated in the judgment
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) and Rule 42 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022 (applicant also invoked Order 3 Rule 9A Civil Procedure Rules 2010, which the court held 'has no application in this Court')

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Esther Nyawira Mucunu v John Mwangi Kariuki", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/170/eng@2024-02-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.