Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedNotice of Motion dated 25th October 2023

Lodwar Wholesalers v Commissioner of Investigation & Enforcement , Kenya Revenue Authority (Civil Appeal (Application) E498 of 2023) [2024] KECA 280 (KLR)

Court of Appeal
8 March 2024
1,425 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal ruled you cannot get a stay of a judgment that merely dismisses your case — you must ask for a stay of the orders that actually require something of you.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Lodwar Wholesalers moved the Court of Appeal under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court's Rules seeking stay of execution of the High Court judgment of 29th September 2023, which had upheld the Tax Appeals Tribunal's decision of 18th December 2019 directing payment of KShs. 203,520,805 to the Commissioner of Domestic Taxes and dismissed the applicant's appeal. The applicant, having lodged a Notice of Appeal, argued the intended appeal was arguable (relying on Joseph Gitahi Gachau) and that payment of the decretal sum would cause it irreparable harm. The Commissioner opposed, contending the appeal raised no arguable point of law contrary to section 56(2) of the Tax Procedures Act, that no evidence of imminent execution or financial prejudice had been tendered, and that any delay in tax collection prejudiced the public interest. It further argued, relying on Nairobi Metropolitan PSV Saccos Union, that the High Court having merely dismissed the appeal, there was no positive order capable of being stayed. The Court, in a single judgment of Asike-Makhandia, P. Nyamweya and J. Mativo, reaffirmed the twin rule 5(2)(b) principles drawn from Trust Bank v Investech Bank. Adopting its reasoning in George Ole Sangui v Kedong Ranch and Western College v Oranga, it held that the order sought to be stayed was a negative order - a mere dismissal incapable of execution or enforcement - and that this finding disposed of the application in its entirety. The application was dismissed with no order as to costs on 8th March 2024.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal
  2. 2.Whether the appeal, if successful, would be rendered nugatory absent a stay
  3. 3.Whether the order sought to be stayed - the High Court's dismissal of the appeal - is a positive order capable of being stayed

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a negative order (dismissal of an appeal) is capable of being stayed

Holding

No - a dismissal order is not a positive order requiring any party to do or refrain from doing anything; it is not capable of execution or enforcement and cannot be stayed.

Reasoning

Relying on George Ole Sangui v Kedong Ranch Limited, which itself cited Western College of Arts and Applied Sciences v Oranga, the Court held that a dismissal order simply determines the suit without conferring relief and therefore cannot be enforced or stayed. Since the High Court merely dismissed the applicant's appeal without directing any party to do or refrain from doing anything, there was no order capable of being stayed, and that finding disposed of the entire application.

p. 3
02

The twin principles governing rule 5(2)(b) applications

Holding

Both limbs - arguability and nugatory effect - must be demonstrated to the Court's satisfaction before stay can be granted.

Reasoning

The Court reaffirmed that rule 5(2)(b) jurisdiction is original and discretionary, guided by the interests of justice, and that an applicant must show the appeal is arguable (not frivolous) and that, absent stay, a successful appeal would be rendered nugatory. Both limbs must be satisfied; the applicant's failure on the stayability of the order was fatal.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A negative order, such as the dismissal of a suit or appeal, is not capable of being stayed or executed and an application for stay of such an order must fail
  • An applicant under rule 5(2)(b) must demonstrate both that the appeal is arguable and that it will be rendered nugatory if stay is not granted

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application is dismissed
  2. 2.No order as to costs

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority
majority
majority
On appeal from
High Court
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Relief refused

#

Stay of execution of the High Court judgment and decree dated 29th September 2023

The order sought to be stayed was a negative order (dismissal of the appeal) incapable of being stayed

p. 3

Costs

No order as to costs - each party to bear their own costs

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

The dismissal order cannot be enforced and is not capable of execution. It is not a positive order requiring any party to do or to refrain from doing anything.
p. 3Negative orders incapable of being stayed
In the motion before us, we are satisfied that the applicant seeks a stay of execution of a negative order which on the authorities is incapable of being stayed. This finding settles the application in its entirety.
p. 3Application of the negative-order rule to the motion
Accordingly, we find this application devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
p. 3Disposition - dismissal of the application

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Lodwar Wholesalers v Commissioner of Investigation & Enforcement , Kenya Revenue Authority (Civil Appeal (Application) E498 of 2023) [2024] KECA 280 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Notice of Motion dated 25th October 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/280/eng@2024-03-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.