Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedNot stated in the judgment· [2024] KECA 430 (KLR)

Samuel Gachini Wahiu & 7 others v Magereza Savings and Credit Cooperative Society Limited

Court of Appeal
26 April 2024
852 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed you only have thirty days to apply to strike out an appeal's record, and late applications fail automatically.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a decision of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi (Kairu, Tuiyott and Lesiit, JJ.A) on a Notice of Motion dated 31st May 2019 by Magereza Savings and Credit Cooperative Society Limited, the respondent in a pending appeal, seeking to strike out the appellants' Notice of Appeal dated 22nd June 2018 and Memorandum and Record of Appeal dated 15th March 2019 under Rule 84 (now Rule 86) of the Court of Appeal Rules and Section 81(3) of the Co-operative Societies Act. The respondent contended that no appeal lies because the appeal is from a High Court decision in an appeal from the Co-operative Tribunal, and that under Section 81(3) of that Act the High Court's decision is final. The appellants opposed, relying on Article 164(3) of the Constitution, which they said overrides the earlier statutory provision. The Court did not reach the jurisdictional debate. It found the application itself incompetent: it was common ground that by the time the motion, filed on 31st May 2019, was served, the thirty-day period prescribed by the proviso to Rule 86 had lapsed. Following its decision in Joyce Bochere Nyamweya v Jemima Nyaboke Nyamweya, which in turn applied Gichuki King'ara & Co Advocates v AL Jalal Enterprises Ltd, the Court held that the proviso is mandatory and leaves no discretion, so a late striking-out application is an afterthought and a non-starter. The application was struck out with costs to the appellants. Relying on Rule 107(b), the Court left the parties liberty to address the appeal's competence at the hearing. This is a ruling on an interlocutory application, not a determination of the appeal itself.

Key legal issues

#
01

Timeliness of an application under Rule 84 (now Rule 86) to strike out an appeal

Holding

The application was incompetent because it was filed and served outside the thirty-day period fixed by the proviso to Rule 86, which admits of no discretion, and it was therefore struck out.

Reasoning

The Court adopted its earlier decision in Joyce Bochere Nyamweya v Jemima Nyaboke Nyamweya, where an identically late striking-out application was held incompetent. The proviso to Rule 86 is framed in mandatory terms; the Court has no discretion to extend or overlook the time frame. A late striking-out application is an afterthought and a non-starter. The present application, filed after the thirty days had lapsed, had to suffer the same fate.

p. 3
02

Jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from the High Court in an appeal from the Co-operative Tribunal

Holding

The Court did not decide the jurisdictional question at this stage; it struck out the application and left the question of the appeal's competence to be argued at the hearing of the appeal under Rule 107(b).

Reasoning

The respondent argued that under Section 81(3) of the Co-operative Societies Act the High Court's decision is final, so no appeal lies to the Court of Appeal. The appellants countered that Article 164(3) of the Constitution overrides that statutory bar. Because the striking-out application was itself incompetent for lateness, the Court deferred the jurisdictional challenge, permitting the parties to address competence during the hearing of the appeal.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • The proviso to Rule 86 of the Court of Appeal Rules requiring an application to strike out a notice or record of appeal to be brought within thirty days of service is mandatory, and an application filed outside that period is incompetent and a non-starter.
  • An application under Rule 86 brought after the expiry of thirty days from service of the notice or record of appeal is an afterthought and must be dismissed.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The respondent's Notice of Motion dated 31st May 2019 seeking to strike out the appellants' Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal is struck out
  2. 2.Costs of the application are awarded to the appellants
  3. 3.Under Rule 107(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules, the parties are at liberty during the hearing of the appeal to address the Court on the competence of the appeal
On appeal from
High Court
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 84 (now Rule 86) of the Court of Appeal Rules and Section 81(3) of the Co-operative Societies Act; the appellants invoked Article 164(3) of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Samuel Gachini Wahiu & 7 others v Magereza Savings and Credit Cooperative Society Limited", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/430/eng@2024-04-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.