Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCriminal Application (Nairobi?) - application dated 31st July 2024 (arising from Nyahururu Criminal Case No. 451 of 2015)· [2024] KECA 1726 (KLR)

Peter Emojong v Republic

Court of Appeal of Kenya
4 December 2024
443 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal refused to let a man appeal six years late because he never explained the delay or showed why his appeal deserved a hearing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Peter Emojong was convicted in Nyahururu Criminal Case No. 451 of 2015 on two counts under the Wildlife (Conservation and Management) Act 2013: possession of wildlife trophies without a permit, fined Kshs.1,000,000 or five years' imprisonment, and dealing in wildlife trophies without a permit, fined Kshs.20,000,000 or life imprisonment in default. The High Court (Wendoh, J.), by a decision dated 10th April 2018, upheld the trial court's decision. The applicant, acting in person and serving a life sentence, filed an application dated 31st July 2024 seeking leave to file a notice of appeal out of time, stating that he did not receive a copy of the High Court judgment when it was delivered. The respondent, while acknowledging the delay of six years and three months as inordinate, did not oppose the application given the length of the life sentence. M. Warsame, JA, applying the Supreme Court's guidance in Andrew Kiplagat Chemaringo v Paul Kipkorir Kibet that any delay must be satisfactorily explained, found that the applicant had shown no attempts or difficulties in obtaining the judgment and had not attached a draft Memorandum of Appeal. Holding the delay inordinate and unexplained, the judge found no basis to exercise discretion and dismissed the application with no orders as to costs. The applicant may pursue certification only through a fresh, properly supported application.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the six-year-and-three-month delay in seeking leave to appeal out of time was satisfactorily explained

Holding

The delay was inordinate and unexplained; the applicant, though acting in person and serving a life sentence, showed no difficulties in obtaining the judgment and filed no draft Memorandum of Appeal, so the discretion was not exercised in his favour.

Reasoning

The court applied the Chemaringo test that delay must be satisfactorily explained to unlock discretionary favour. Although the applicant is in person and serving a life sentence, and the respondent did not oppose, he gave no evidence of attempts or difficulties in obtaining the High Court judgment and did not attach a draft Memorandum of Appeal. Without plausible reasons and an indication of an arguable appeal, the discretion could not be exercised favourably.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant for extension of time must satisfactorily explain the delay; inordinate, unexplained delay, coupled with absence of a draft Memorandum of Appeal, disentitles the applicant to the court's discretionary favour.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Application for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time dismissed
  2. 2.No orders as to costs ("with no orders to cost")
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya
Nyahururu Criminal Case No. 451 of 2015 (first appellate decision dated 10th April 2018)
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent discretion to extend time for filing a notice of appeal to the Supreme Court (Court of Appeal Rules procedure for certification/leave)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Peter Emojong v Republic", Case Analysis (2024). Criminal Application (Nairobi?) - application dated 31st July 2024 (arising from Nyahururu Criminal Case No. 451 of 2015). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/1726/eng@2024-12-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.