Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedCivil Application E065 of 2024· [2025] KECA 71 (KLR)

The Nandi County Public Service Board & Another Applicant v Zeddy Jeptanui Ketter & 461 Others

Court of Appeal
24 January 2025
1,251 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal paused a ruling requiring Nandi County to keep hundreds of employees on payroll, protecting public funds pending the appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is the reserved Reasons judgment of the Court of Appeal (Warsame, Mativo and Gachoka, JJA) for orders made on 18 December 2024 allowing a Notice of Motion dated 2 December 2024 by the Nandi County Public Service Board and another, seeking stay of execution of a ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret (M. Onyango, J.) delivered on 21 November 2024. In the ruling below, the learned judge confirmed status quo orders, deemed employees without revocation letters to be in employment, suspended revocation letters already issued, and dismissed the applicants' preliminary objection on jurisdiction based on exhaustion. The applicants filed a Notice of Appeal and a draft memorandum raising 10 grounds. Applying the well-settled rule 5(2)(b) principles from Stanley Kang'ethe Kinyanjui v Tony Ketter, the court found the appeal arguable on grounds including jurisdiction and whether non-parties can enjoy orders, and found the appeal would be rendered nugatory because continued salary payments risked unrecoverable loss of public funds. The court stayed the ruling pending the hearing of Civil Appeal No. 107 of 2024, restrained both parties from taking further action, directed filing of submissions and an expedited hearing in 2025, and ordered that costs of the application abide the outcome of the appeal. The decision binds subordinate courts and tribunals as a restatement of the rule 5(2)(b) test; it does not disturb the ELRC ruling, which remains intact pending the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Arguability of the intended appeal

Holding

The draft memorandum raising 10 grounds, including jurisdiction and whether non-parties can enjoy orders, met the arguability threshold.

Reasoning

The court examined the draft memorandum of appeal with 10 grounds and identified among them the questions of the trial court's jurisdiction under the exhaustion doctrine and whether persons not party to a suit can enjoy orders. These were sufficient to constitute an arguable appeal, with merits left to the appeal bench.

p. 3
02

Nugatory-ness if stay is denied

Holding

Denial of stay risked loss of public funds if salaries continued, since respondents had not shown ability to reimburse if the appeal succeeded.

Reasoning

Applying the Kang'ethe-Ketter nugatory test, the court asked whether what is to be stayed is reversible or compensable in damages. If the status quo on employment and salaries continued and the applicants later succeeded, the respondents had not demonstrated they would reimburse salaries paid. Conversely, if the appeal failed, the respondents would receive their salaries.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant under rule 5(2)(b) must satisfy the conjunctive tests of arguability and nugatory-ness.
  • An arguable appeal need not succeed; it need only be arguable, and a single arguable ground suffices.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The ruling dated 21st November 2024 (M. Onyango, J.) is stayed pending the hearing of Civil Appeal No. 107 of 2024
  2. 2.No party shall take any further action pending the hearing and determination of the appeal
  3. 3.The appellants to file and serve their submissions within 15 days; respondents to file theirs within 15 days upon service
  4. 4.The appeal to be heard on a priority basis in the next term, 2025
  5. 5.Costs of the application to abide the outcome of the appeal
On appeal from
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
ELRC Case No. E012 of 2024
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules (application for stay of execution pending appeal); reasons reserved under rule 34(7)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "The Nandi County Public Service Board & Another Applicant v Zeddy Jeptanui Ketter & 461 Others", Case Analysis (2025). Civil Application E065 of 2024. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/71/eng@2025-01-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.