Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedEldoret Civil Appeal No. 93 of 2019 (substitution application, notice of motion dated 21st February 2023)· [2025] KECA 1054 (KLR)

Agnes Jerotich Toloin (suing As The Legal Representative of The Estate of The Late Jonah Kipsaina) v Rael Tarlock Sawe Philip Kiprock Sawe Francis Kipkemboi Sawe (all Suing As The Legal Representatives of The Late David Cheptum Sawe) & 1 other

Court of Appeal of Kenya
12 June 2025
454 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A late substitution application cost the applicant their place in an appeal: the Court of Appeal requires substitution of a deceased party within twelve months of death, no exceptions taken.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal at Eldoret, delivered by M. Warsame, JA, on 12th June 2025, on a notice of motion dated 21st February 2023. The applicant, administrator of the estate of Jonah Kipsaina Cherutich, who died on 14th January 2022 while the 2nd respondent in Eldoret Civil Appeal No. 93 of 2019, sought substitution in place of the deceased. The motion was anchored on Article 50 of the Constitution, Sections 1A and 1B of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 24 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The Court held that the applicant had invoked the wrong provisions: the correct basis for substitution of a deceased party in an appeal before the Court of Appeal is Rule 102 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022, which requires such an application to be made within twelve months of death, failing which the appeal abates. Computing the period and excluding the Christmas recess, the deadline was 7th February 2023; the application filed on 21st February 2023 was therefore out of time and the appeal had already abated. The Court dismissed the application with no order as to costs. The effect is that the pending appeal cannot proceed against the deceased 2nd respondent's estate on this application, and any revival would require a fresh application under Rule 102(3) on sufficient cause being shown.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the substitution application was filed within the statutory twelve-month window

Holding

The application was filed out of time; the twelve months expired on 7th February 2023 (Christmas recess excluded) and the application was filed on 21st February 2023, so the appeal had already abated

Reasoning

Rule 102 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022 requires an application for substitution of a deceased party's legal representative to be made within twelve months of death. The 2nd respondent died on 14th January 2022; allowing for the exclusion of the Christmas recess, the deadline was 7th February 2023. The application filed on 21st February 2023 was therefore out of time, and the appeal stood abated when it was filed.

p. 2
02

The correct legal basis for substitution of a deceased party on appeal

Holding

Rule 102 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022, not the Civil Procedure Rules provisions cited by the applicant, governs substitution of a deceased party in the Court of Appeal

Reasoning

The applicant anchored the motion on Article 50 of the Constitution, Sections 1A and B of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 24 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The Court held these were not the correct provisions; substitution in an appeal before the Court of Appeal is governed by the Court of Appeal Rules, specifically Rule 102 on death of a party to an appeal.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal does not abate on the death of a party, but an application to substitute the legal representative must be made within twelve months of the death, failing which the appeal abates
  • The correct provision governing substitution of a deceased party in the Court of Appeal is Rule 102 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022, not Order 24 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 21st February 2023 seeking substitution of the applicant in place of the deceased 2nd respondent is dismissed
  2. 2.No order as to costs
On appeal from
null
null
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 50 of the Constitution; Section 1A & B of the Civil Procedure Act; Order 24 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules; Rule 102 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022 (as identified by the Court as the correct provision)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Agnes Jerotich Toloin (suing As The Legal Representative of The Estate of The Late Jonah Kipsaina) v Rael Tarlock Sawe Philip Kiprock Sawe Francis Kipkemboi Sawe (all Suing As The Legal Representatives of The Late David Cheptum Sawe) & 1 other", Case Analysis (2025). Eldoret Civil Appeal No. 93 of 2019 (substitution application, notice of motion dated 21st February 2023). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/1054/eng@2025-06-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.