Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2026] KECA 1419 (KLR)

The Sacco Societies Regulatory Authority v Nyati Sacco Society Limited & 1 other

Court of Appeal of Kenya
13 July 2026
851 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal allowed a regulator's late appeal filing, ruling a ten-day delay caused by tracing a voluminous court record was excusable.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-judge ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi delivered on 13th July 2026 by L. Kimaru, JA, on an application under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules for extension of time to file the record of appeal out of time. The applicant, a statutory regulatory body aggrieved by a High Court decision of 3rd November 2025, had timeously lodged a notice of appeal on 6th November 2025 but failed to file the record of appeal by the 6th January 2026 deadline, filing the application on 16th January 2026 - a delay of ten days. It explained that a portion of the voluminous trial record could not be traced in time. The respondent, through a replying affidavit sworn by its Acting Chief Executive Officer, Joyce Kibuti, opposed the application, contending that no cogent reasons were given for the delay (filing now being online), that the intended appeal sought to introduce new issues, and that it would be prejudiced. Both parties accepted that the Rule 4 discretion is unfettered but guided by the settled principles in Fakir Mohamed v. Joseph Mugambi & 2 others [2006] KECA 240 (KLR), which the Court applied. Holding that a ten-day delay is not inordinate and that compiling a voluminous record can legitimately take time, the Court allowed the application, directed the applicant to file and serve the record of appeal within fourteen days, and awarded the respondent costs assessed at Kshs. 15,000/-.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the ten-day delay in filing the record of appeal was inordinate and excusable

Holding

The delay of ten days was not inordinate and the explanation - inability to trace a portion of the voluminous trial record in time - was excusable.

Reasoning

The Court applied the settled Fakir Mohamed principles: length of delay, reason for delay, prejudice to the respondent and related factors. The applicant, a statutory regulatory body, had timeously filed its notice of appeal on 6th November 2025 but could not compile the record because a portion of the voluminous trial record could not be traced. The application was filed on 16th January 2026 against a 6th January 2026 deadline, a delay of only ten days, which the Court held could not by any stretch of imagination be inordinate.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • In exercising its unfettered discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules to extend time, the Court is guided by settled factors including the period and reason for delay, the chances of the appeal succeeding, and prejudice to the respondent.
  • A short delay of ten days is not inordinate, and the time taken to compile a voluminous record of appeal can constitute an excusable reason for delay.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application for extension of time to file the record of appeal out of time is allowed
  2. 2.The applicant shall file and serve the record of appeal within fourteen (14) days of the date of the ruling
  3. 3.The respondent shall have costs of the application assessed at Kshs. 15,000/-
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules (inherent discretion to extend time)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "The Sacco Societies Regulatory Authority v Nyati Sacco Society Limited & 1 other", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/1419/eng@2026-07-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.