Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment (Civil Application, Mombasa)· [2026] KECA 1566 (KLR)

Solfin Solutions Ltd v Margaret Wawuda Mwakima

Court of Appeal of Kenya
31 July 2026
3,430 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal excused Solfin Solutions' two-day late appeal filing but left its key requests to a full panel of judges.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal at Mombasa, delivered on 31st July 2026 by Ngenye-Macharia, JA, sitting as a single judge, on a Notice of Motion dated 31st July 2025 by Solfin Solutions Limited. The applicant sought, among eight prayers, an extension of time to have its Notice of Appeal (uploaded on the e-filing portal on 7th July 2025 but receipted on 18th July 2025) and its Memorandum of Appeal deemed duly filed, following a High Court ruling of 2nd July 2025 concerning an attempt to set aside an arbitral award. The respondent opposed on grounds of late filing of the leave application, defects in the supporting affidavit (jurat omitting place of swearing; exhibits not sealed strictly per Rule 9 of the Oaths and Statutory Declarations Rules) and lack of merit. The single judge held that prayers for stay of execution and for leave to appeal fall outside a single judge's jurisdiction under Rule 55(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022, and must go to a full bench, criticising omnibus applications. The affidavit defects were held to be curable technicalities under Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution and Order 19 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Applying the settled extension-of-time principles, the court found the two-day delay not inordinate, no prejudice established, and allowed prayers 5 and 7, deeming the Notice and Memorandum of Appeal as duly filed, with service within 7 days. Costs were nevertheless awarded to the respondent. The applicant must seek a full-bench date for the undetermined prayers.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of a single judge over omnibus applications

Holding

The single judge could determine only the prayers for extension of time and deeming of filings; prayers for stay and leave to appeal are reserved for a full bench.

Reasoning

Rule 55(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 excludes applications for leave to appeal and for stay of execution, injunction or stay of proceedings from the single-judge track. The applicant conceded the court had no jurisdiction over the stay prayers. The judge therefore severed the competent prayers, noted that the leave prayer must go to a full bench, and directed the applicant to seek a date before a full bench for the undetermined prayers.

02

Defects in the supporting affidavit and exhibits

Holding

The omission of the place of swearing in the jurat and the manner of sealing exhibits were technical defects of form cured by Article 159(2)(d) and Order 19 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Reasoning

Although Section 5 of the Oaths and Statutory Declarations Act uses 'shall', the deponent's identity and swearing before a Commissioner for Oaths were unchallenged. All exhibits except the arbitral award were serialized and stamped; the deviation was one of form. Striking out the affidavit would deny the applicant a hearing; substantive justice prevails over such technicalities, consistent with Kenneth K. Mwangi v City County of Nairobi.

p. 5
03

Extension of time to file Notice and Memorandum of Appeal

Holding

The delay of about 2 days beyond the 14-day period in Rule 77 was not inordinate, no prejudice was shown, and the prayers for deeming the Notice and Memorandum of Appeal as duly filed were granted.

Reasoning

Applying the settled principles from Leo Sila Mutiso v Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi and Paul Wanjohi Mathenge v Duncan Gichane Mathenge, the court found the delay short and explained (e-filing fee prompt failure), the screenshot evidence weak but the delay minimal, and no prejudice to the respondent since the merits await the full bench. The applicant was accorded an opportunity to be heard on appeal.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Applications for leave to appeal, and for stay of execution, injunction or stay of proceedings, fall outside a single judge's jurisdiction and must be heard by a full bench under Rule 55(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022.
  • Omnibus applications mixing prayers for a single judge with prayers for a full bench create an untidy situation requiring referral of the undetermined prayers to a full bench.
  • An affidavit whose jurat omits the place of swearing, and exhibits not sealed strictly per Rule 9 of the Oaths and Statutory Declarations Rules, are curable defects in the light of Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution and Order 19 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  • The principles for extension of time are: length of and explanation for the delay, whether the intended appeal is possibly arguable, and prejudice to the respondent; each case turns on its own circumstances.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Appeal dated 7th July 2025 be and is hereby deemed as duly filed.
  2. 2.The said Notice of Motion dated 7th July 2025 be served within 7 days of the date of this Ruling.
  3. 3.The Memorandum of Appeal dated 31st July 2025 be and is hereby deemed as duly filed, and the same be served within 7 days of this Ruling.
  4. 4.Costs are awarded to the respondent.
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 3A of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act (Cap 9); Rules 4, 5(2)(b), 43, 44(1), 45, 77(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022; Article 159 of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Solfin Solutions Ltd v Margaret Wawuda Mwakima", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in judgment (Civil Application, Mombasa). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/1566/eng@2026-07-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.