Alice Nduta Mburu & 5 Others v Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited
The bottom line
#The Court of Appeal refused six applicants a second chance to seek Supreme Court review, ruling their repeat application was barred and an abuse of process.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether a second application for extension of time seeking orders already declined is maintainable
The application was dismissed as res judicata and an abuse of process; the applicants sought to re-litigate orders declined by Muchelule, JA. on 28th February 2025, and the correct remedy was a Rule 57 reference, not a fresh Rule 4 application.
The court traced the procedural history: a 2019 leave application struck out as filed out of time; a November 2024 Rule 4 extension application dismissed on 28th February 2025; and the present April 2025 application seeking identical orders. Re-litigating an adjudicated matter without a Rule 57 reference is res judicata and abusive, so the discretion need not be exercised and other issues need not be considered.
Legal principles established
#- A fresh application for extension of time seeking the same orders already declined by the Court is res judicata and an abuse of the court process; the proper course against a Single Judge's decision is a reference under Rule 57 of the Court of Appeal Rules.
Court orders
#- 1.Dismissal of the application dated 16th April 2025
- 2.Costs of the application to the respondent
- On appeal from
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Civil Appeal No. 164 of 2018
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Alice Nduta Mburu & 5 Others v Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited", Case Analysis (2026). Civil Application No. E250 of 2025. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/1735/eng@2026-09-25
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.