Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEnvironment and Land Appeal E003 of 2021· [2022] KEELC 15314 (KLR)

Jesus Celebration Center Ministry Int & another v Redeemed Gospel Church Inc & 2 others

Environment and Land Court
7 December 2022
3,960 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court ruled that a land dispute with fixable paperwork errors must go to full trial, not be thrown out early.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a first appeal to the Environment and Land Court at Kitui against a ruling of Senior Principal Magistrate Hon. J.W Wang'ang'a (Mutomo ELC E008 of 2021) dismissing the Appellants' application to strike out the 1st Respondent's suit. The 1st Respondent, claiming to be a bona fide purchaser in occupation since 1996, sued over parcel Mutomo/Mwala/1103, alleging the 1st Appellant was fraudulently registered over the same land, though the Appellants held title to Kitui/Mwala/1103. The Appellants argued the plaint disclosed no cause of action against them, that the discrepancy in parcel numbers could not be cured under Section 79 of the Land Registration Act, and that the verifying affidavit lacked authority under seal. The Land Registrar and Attorney General confirmed both parcel references denoted one parcel due to a typographical error during titling. Kimani J framed a single issue: whether the trial magistrate erred in failing to find the suit incurably defective. The court held the conflicting parcel numbers and the Appellants' denial of the official search were triable issues; a certificate of search reflects the register; and pleadings can be amended at any stage before close of pleadings. Applying DT Dobie, Crescent Construction and Yaya Towers, the court held the suit was not hopeless or incurable by amendment and striking out would offend natural justice. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the Respondents and the file remitted to the trial court for hearing and final determination.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the plaint was incurably defective for referring to Mutomo/Mwala/1103 when the Appellants own Kitui/Mwala/1103

Holding

No - the discrepancy in parcel numbers is a triable issue; the Registrar confirmed a typographical error and the two references denote the same parcel

Reasoning

The 1st Respondent produced a Certificate of Official Search showing the suit parcel registered in the 1st Appellant's name. The 3rd and 4th Respondents confirmed both references denote one parcel due to a typographical error during titling, corroborated by a Ministry of Lands letter. Whether the two references belong to the same parcel and the ownership dispute must be determined at trial, so the suit cannot be dismissed at a preliminary stage.

p. 5
02

Whether failure to seek rectification of the register renders the suit defective

Holding

No - the plaint raised a reasonable cause of action and amendment was available

Reasoning

The court held a certificate of search reflects the register, and rectification is possible under Section 79 of the Land Registration Act if parties so desire. At the preliminary stage amendments to pleadings are still possible, and amendment would cause the Appellants no prejudice. The trial court properly exercised its discretion in declining to strike out the plaint.

p. 6
03

Whether the power to strike out pleadings was properly withheld

Holding

Yes - the power is discretionary and must be exercised sparingly and with great caution

Reasoning

Relying on DT Dobie, Crescent Construction and Yaya Towers, the court held the court ought not to deal with merits at the striking-out stage, and natural justice requires that no litigant however weak be driven from the seat of justice. The suit was not hopeless or incurable by amendment, so the trial court's dismissal of the application was upheld.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • A certificate of official search is a reflection of the Land Register
  • No suit should be summarily dismissed unless it is hopeless, plainly discloses no reasonable cause of action, and is incurable by amendment
  • Pleadings may be amended at any stage before close of pleadings, on the parties' instance or the court's own motion

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed with costs
  2. 2.The trial court file be returned to the Senior Principal Magistrate's Court at Mutomo in ELC E008 of 2021 for hearing and final determination of the suit
  3. 3.Costs of the appeal shall be to the Respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Article 159
  • Land Registration ActSection 79
  • Land Registration ActSection 34
  • Land Registration ActSection 26(1)(a & b)
  • Civil Procedure Rules (2010)Order 2 Rule 15
  • Civil Procedure Rules (2010)Order 4 Rule 1(4)

Cases cited (10)

  • Szaredo Investments Limited v Chief Land Registrar & 2 others
    [2018] eKLR

    Court has discretion on striking out; under Article 159 a litigant should be given a chance to comply before drastic steps

  • Independent Electroral and Boundaries Commission & Another v Stephen Mutinda & 3 others
    [2014] eKLR

    Parties are bound by their pleadings (relied on by Appellants)

  • DT Dobie & co Ltd v Muchina
    (1982) KLR

    Court should act cautiously before dismissing a suit; should not deal with merits at striking-out stage; meaning of reasonable cause of action

  • Susan Rokih v Joyce Kandie & 6 others
    [2018] eKLR

    Room for amendment at preliminary stages (relied on by 1st Respondent)

  • Crescent Construction co Ltd v Delphis Bank
    [2007] eKLR

    Power to strike out is discretionary, to be exercised with greatest care and caution

  • Madison Insurance Company Limited v Augustine Kamanda Gitau
    [2020] eKLR

    Power to strike out pleadings must be sparingly exercised only in the clearest of cases

  • John Nyagaka Osoro v Reynold Karisa Charo & 5 others
    [2021] eKLR

    Purpose of amendment of pleadings per Halsbury's Laws of England

  • Yaya Towers Limited v Trade Bank Limited (In Liquidation)
    [2000] eKLR

    No suit should be summarily dismissed unless hopeless and incurable by amendment

  • Drummond-Jackson v BMA
    [1970] 1 WLR 688

    Reasonable cause of action means one with some chance of success (quoted within DT Dobie)

  • Republic of Peru v Peruvian Guano Company
    36 Ch Div 489

    A pleading will not be struck out unless it is demurrable and something worse (quoted within DT Dobie)

On appeal from
Senior Principal Magistrate's Court at Mutomo
ELC E008 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
First appellate jurisdiction over the subordinate court under the Environment and Land Court Act (appeal against ruling of Senior Principal Magistrate's Court at Mutomo)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Jesus Celebration Center Ministry Int & another v Redeemed Gospel Church Inc & 2 others", Case Analysis (2022). Environment and Land Appeal E003 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/15314/eng@2022-12-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.