Okidi v Opado & 2 others
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Questions the Court framed
#The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.
- 1.Whether stay of execution of the trial court's judgment should issue pending the hearing and determination of the appeal
Key legal issues
#Whether stay of execution pending appeal should be granted
Stay of execution granted by consent, with the respondents continuing in occupation of the suit land as the prevailing status quo pending determination of the appeal.
The application was a Notice of Motion dated 21st September 2023 seeking stay of execution pending appeal. Counsel for both parties informed the court the application could be compromised to pave way for hearing of the appeal, with no objection from the appellant's counsel. The court, invoking Article 159(2)(b) and section 3 of the Environment and Land Court Act, granted stay and directed maintenance of the status quo.
Legal principles established
#- The court may determine a stay application on consent terms guided by the overriding objective under Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution and section 3 of the Environment and Land Court Act.
Court orders
#- 1.Stay of execution of the trial court's judgment delivered on 24th August 2022 in Oyugis Senior Principal Magistrate's Environment and Land case No. 33 of 2021 pending the hearing and determination of the appeal
- 2.The appellant and the respondents to maintain the prevailing status quo over the suit land, Parcel No Central Kasipul/Kamuma/1767, with the respondents continuing in occupation pending the hearing and determination of the appeal
- 3.The appellant's counsel to file and serve the record of appeal on or before 4th December 2023 for directions
The bench
#One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.
Wrote the judgment
- On appeal from
- Senior Principal Magistrate's Court, Oyugis
- Oyugis Senior Principal Magistrate's Environment and Land case No. 33 of 2021
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 and section 3 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2015
Quotable passages
#Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.
There be stay of execution of the trial court’s judgment delivered on 24th August 2022 in Oyugis Senior Principal Magistrate’s Environment and Land case No. 33 of 2021 pending the hearing and determination of this appeal.
The appellant and the respondents to maintain the prevailing status quo over the suit land, Parcel No Central Kasipul/Kamuma/1767 namely that the respondents to continue in occupation of the same pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
The appellant’s counsel to file and serve record of appeal on or before 4th December 2023 for directions.
Issues in the judgment
#Inconsistent spelling of 1st respondent's name between cause title and body
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Okidi v Opado & 2 others", Case Analysis (2023). Environment and Land Appeal E011 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/20918/eng@2023-10-23
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.