Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutELC Case dated 4/03/2024 (Kwale)

Al-Ghaafiry (Suing as the Lawful Attorney of Mrs Bintali Kibamba) v Izwe Loans Kenya Ltd (Land Case E013 of 2021) [2025] KEELC 905 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
27 February 2025
3,043 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court struck out a borrower's bid to stop a bank selling charged land, ruling loan disputes belong in the High Court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff, acting as attorney of Binti Kibamba, filed a suit against the Defendant bank with a Notice of Motion seeking temporary injunctions restraining the Defendant from transferring, alienating, advertising for sale, selling or dealing in Plot No. KWALE/RAMISI PHASE II SCHEME/1079, pending determination of the suit. The suit arose from a loan facility of Kshs. 1,950,000 secured by a charge over the suit property, with the Plaintiff alleging the property was undervalued and seeking a permanent injunction and a declaration that the valuation report by Zenith (Management) Valuers Limited was a nullity. The Defendant filed a preliminary objection contending that the court lacked jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, the dispute being a commercial matter for the High Court, and that it could not be salvaged by transfer, citing Albert Chaurembo Mumba. The court, guided by Mukisa Biscuits, found the objection properly raised as a point of law. Relying on Bank of Africa v TSS Investment and Co-operative Bank v Kangethe Njuguna, it held that the ELC's jurisdiction covers use and occupation of and title to land, not mortgages or charges; the claim was solely a commercial dispute over loan repayment and enforcement of statutory power of sale. Following Albert Chaurembo Mumba and Equity Bank v Bruce Mutie Mutuku, the court held it had no power to transfer the suit. The preliminary objection was upheld, the suit struck out, and no orders as to costs were made.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the preliminary objection raised is merited
  2. 2.Whether the orders sought in the application should be granted
  3. 3.Whether the suit can be salvaged by transfer to the High Court

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the preliminary objection was properly raised as a pure point of law

Holding

It was properly raised since, if upheld, the suit would be disposed of without ascertaining facts.

Reasoning

Applying Mukisa Biscuits, the court held that the objection on jurisdiction was a point of law arising from the pleadings which, if successful, would dispose of the suit preliminarily without the need to ascertain facts.

p. 4
02

Whether the ELC has jurisdiction over a claim to restrain exercise of statutory power of sale over charged land

Holding

No. The claim is a commercial dispute over loan amounts and enforcement of a charge, outside the ELC's jurisdiction.

Reasoning

Relying on Bank of Africa Kenya Ltd v TSS Investment Ltd and Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd v Patrick Kangethe Njuguna, the court held that the ELC has jurisdiction over disputes connected to use of land and contracts incidental to use, which do not include mortgages and charges. The user of the land here was only to secure a loan; the prayers sought (permanent injunction against sale and declaration on the valuation) were derivative of the loan and charge arrangements.

p. 6
03

Whether the suit could be salvaged by transfer to the High Court

Holding

No. A court lacking jurisdiction has no power to transfer; the suit is dead on arrival.

Reasoning

Following Albert Chaurembo Mumba and Equity Bank v Bruce Mutie Mutuku, the court held that transfer is unavailable where the court lacks jurisdiction ab initio; there is nothing capable of transfer.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • The ELC's jurisdiction is limited to disputes relating to environment and the use and occupation of, and title to land; claims over enforcement of statutory power of sale under a charge, and related valuation disputes, are commercial disputes for the High Court.
  • A court without jurisdiction cannot transfer a suit to a court with jurisdiction.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Preliminary objection sustained
  2. 2.Suit struck out for lack of jurisdiction
  3. 3.No orders as to costs

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution of Kenya and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Relief refused

#

Temporary injunction restraining the Defendant from transferring, alienating, advertising for sale, selling or dealing in Plot No. KWALE/RAMISI PHASE II SCHEME/1079

The court found it had no jurisdiction to hear the dispute, which is a commercial dispute over a loan facility and charge falling within the High Court's jurisdiction

p. 6

Transfer of the suit to the High Court Commercial Division

A court without jurisdiction has no power to transfer a suit; there is nothing to transfer

p. 6

Costs

No orders as to costs - 'Costs are the discretion of the court and since there is still a loan to repay, I will therefore make no orders as to costs.'

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

In the premises, this court finds and holds that it has no jurisdiction to hear and determine this dispute. I must down my tools. The suit is hereby stuck ofi.
p. 6Final orders - striking out for want of jurisdiction
Costs are the discretion of the court and since there is still a loan to repay, I will therefore make no orders as to costs.
p. 6Costs order
suits filed before courts without jurisdiction, the said courts have no power to transfer the suit. Indeed, the suit is dead on arrival and this court cannot purport to be a mortician. There is nothing to transfer.
p. 6No power to transfer where jurisdiction is lacking
… a preliminary objection consists of a point of law which has been pleaded, or which arises by clear implication out of pleadings, and which if argued as a preliminary point may dispose of the suit.
p. 4Definition of preliminary objection (Mukisa Biscuits)
the claim herein is solely a commercial dispute over the amounts owed by the plaintifi.
p. 6Nature of the claim as commercial, not land use

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

The judgment states the suit is 'stuck ofi' (struck out) but does not expressly set out numbered final orders; the disposition is embedded in the narrative closing paragraph.

minor

The defendant is referred to only as 'Zenith'/'the Defendant' bank while the valuer is 'Zenith Management Valuers'; the exact corporate name of the defendant bank is not clearly stated.

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Al-Ghaafiry (Suing as the Lawful Attorney of Mrs Bintali Kibamba) v Izwe Loans Kenya Ltd (Land Case E013 of 2021) [2025] KEELC 905 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). ELC Case dated 4/03/2024 (Kwale). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/905/eng@2025-02-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.