Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutNot stated in the judgment· [2025] KEELC 3024 (KLR)

Mukui v Bridge Developers Limited & 3 others (Miscellaneous Case E001 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 3024 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
27 March 2025
833 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Environment and Land Court ruling at Nairobi (Milimani), delivered by A. Omollo, J on 27th March 2025, determines a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 7th July 2024 filed by the 1st and 2nd Respondents in an application seeking removal of a caveat registered over title I.R 28038, measuring approximately 1.784 HA in Mavoko, Machakos County. The objection raised three grounds: want of territorial jurisdiction, lack of locus standi, and abuse of process for failure to exhaust dispute-resolution mechanisms in the company's Memorandum and Articles of Association. The Respondents argued, relying on The Owners of Motor Vessel "Lillian S" v Caltex Oil Kenya Ltd, that land situate in Machakos County falls under the Machakos ELC, not Nairobi Milimani. Applying the Supreme Court's dictum in Aviation & Allied Workers Union Kenya v Kenya Airways Ltd that a preliminary objection must rest on a pure point of law, and the High Court's exposition of pecuniary, territorial and subject-matter jurisdiction in Republic v Magistrates Court, Mombasa; Absin Synegy Limited, the court held that the Applicant's own pleadings confirmed the suit property lies outside Nairobi City County. The exhaustion ground failed as it required evidence. Upholding the objection on the territorial jurisdiction ground alone, the court struck out the application with costs to the 1st and 2nd Respondents. The locus standi ground was not determined.

Key legal issues

#
01

Territorial jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court

Holding

The Nairobi ELC lacks territorial jurisdiction over a suit concerning land situate in Mavoko, Machakos County

Reasoning

The subject matter of the application is removal of a caveat over title I.R 28038 measuring approximately 1.784 HA in Mavoko, Machakos. By its own pleadings the Applicant confirmed the property is not in Nairobi City County, which defines this court's territorial jurisdiction; the objection therefore succeeded on a pure point of law.

p. 2
02

Exhaustion of alternative remedies under the company's constitution

Holding

The exhaustion ground failed as it required evidence and was not a pure point of law

Reasoning

Determining whether the company's Memorandum and Articles of Association provide alternative dispute resolution mechanisms would require evidence, namely production of those documents. A preliminary objection cannot rest on facts requiring contest or proof by evidence, so that ground could not sustain the objection.

p. 2
03

Locus standi

Holding

Not determined; the objection was upheld solely on the territorial jurisdiction ground

Reasoning

Although raised as the second ground, the court did not make any finding on locus standi, resting the decision entirely on territorial jurisdiction.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A preliminary objection may only be raised on a pure question of law where there is no contest as to facts
  • A court without jurisdiction over the subject matter must down its tools

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection is upheld on the ground of territorial jurisdiction
  2. 2.The application is struck out with costs to the 1st and 2nd Respondents
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2) of the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act (territorial jurisdiction)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mukui v Bridge Developers Limited & 3 others (Miscellaneous Case E001 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 3024 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/3024/eng@2025-03-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.