Cherogony v Rono & 10 others (Environment and Land Case 212 of 2013) [2025] KEELC 8407 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether leave should issue for new counsel to come on record after judgment
Leave granted; the application was unopposed and had merit under Order 9 Rule 9.
The court noted that the applicants sought leave for Nakuru Community Justice Center, Kituo Cha Sheria – Nakuru Branch to replace their former advocates after judgment pursuant to Order 9 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The respondent did not oppose this prayer, and the court found it merited, so it was allowed.
Whether the court can grant an eviction order post-judgment where no counterclaim for eviction was filed
No. The judgment dismissed the adverse possession suit and contained no executable eviction order; the court is functus officio on matters arising from its judgment other than execution of the decree.
The judgment of 23 March 2025 dismissed the respondent's adverse possession Originating Summons for failure to prove 12 years' possession. It issued no eviction order capable of execution. The applicants, having filed no counterclaim for eviction while the suit was pending, cannot obtain substantive eviction relief by application; the court, having delivered final judgment, is functus officio. The proper course is a separate suit under Section 152E of the Land Act.
Whether granting eviction under the application would be procedurally proper
No; it would re-open the concluded case, and eviction must follow the notice regime in Section 152E of the Land Act, 2012.
The court held that an eviction order at this stage would untidy the suit and amount to re-opening the case for substantive orders. Section 152E of the Land Act requires a notice of not less than three months, in writing, published in at least two daily newspapers and displayed at strategic locations, specifying removal conditions and served on the deputy county commissioner and police, before eviction from private land.
Legal principles established
#- A respondent to an adverse possession suit must file a counterclaim for eviction while the suit is subsisting; after judgment the court is functus officio and cannot grant substantive eviction orders by way of application
- Functus officio is an expression of the principle of finality preventing re-opening of decided matters
- Eviction from private land requires prior notice under Section 152E of the Land Act, 2012, including publication and service requirements
Court orders
#- 1.Leave granted to Nakuru Community Justice Center, Kituo Cha Sheria – Nakuru Branch C/O Joseph Kimotho to come on record for the 1st and 2nd Applicants after judgment
- 2.The application for an order of eviction dismissed with costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Original civil jurisdiction; application under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules following the court's judgment of 23 March 2025 dismissing an adverse possession suit
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Cherogony v Rono & 10 others (Environment and Land Case 212 of 2013) [2025] KEELC 8407 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/8407/eng@2025-12-03
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.