Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2026] KEELC 237 (KLR)

Ogone v Oduor (Suing on Behalf of the Estate of Charles Evans Omondi - Deceased) (Miscellaneous Application E008 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 237 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
22 January 2026
1,848 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's High Court ruled advocates must charge at least Kshs 75,000 for miscellaneous applications, and that 14-day cost objection deadlines run from the taxing master's reasons letter.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a reference under Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order by the Advocate/Applicant against the taxing officer's (Hon. Maureen Nyigei, Principal Magistrate) ruling of 23rd January 2025, which awarded Kshs 30,000/= as instructions fees under item 1 of the Respondent's/Client's Party and Party Bill of Costs dated 20th August 2024. The bill related to a miscellaneous application seeking extension of time to file an appeal out of time. The Applicant sought setting aside or variation of the assessment and remittal to a different taxing officer, arguing the taxing officer erred in principle by disregarding the mandatory minimum under Schedule 6 paragraph 1 ('other matters') of the Advocates Remuneration Order. The Respondent opposed, contending the reference was filed out of time under Rule 11(2) and that the taxing officer properly exercised discretion. The court held first, that a reference filed within 14 days of the taxing master's letter stating the reasons are contained in the ruling is within time, so the reference was not time-barred. Second, that a miscellaneous application is a complete action in itself falling under 'other matters' in Schedule 6, carrying a minimum of Kshs 75,000/= for defended actions; awarding Kshs 30,000/= was unsupported by the Remuneration Order and an error in principle (undercutting). The court set aside the taxation of item 1, substituted an award of Kshs 75,000/=, left the rest of the bill as taxed, allowed the reference, and ordered each party to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the reference was filed out of time under Rule 11(2) of the Advocates Remuneration Order

Holding

The reference was filed within time, as the 14-day period ran from the date of the taxing master's letter stating the reasons were contained in the ruling.

Reasoning

The court read Rule 11 and found nothing in the provision prohibiting a dissatisfied party from requesting reasons for the taxation from the taxing master. There is no express provision that where reasons are contained in the ruling, the reference must be filed within 14 days from the date of the ruling itself. Accordingly, where reasons are supplied by letter pointing to the ruling, time runs from that letter, and the reference filed 20th February 2025 was within time.

p. 4
02

Whether the taxing master erred in principle in awarding Kshs 30,000/= as instructions fees under item 1 of the Bill

Holding

Yes. A miscellaneous application is a complete action falling under 'other matters' in Schedule 6, carrying a minimum of Kshs 75,000/= for defended actions; awarding Kshs 30,000/= was unsupported by the Remuneration Order and constituted an error in principle (undercutting).

Reasoning

The court distinguished applications in actions commenced by plaint, Originating Summons or Petition from miscellaneous applications, holding the latter are complete actions in themselves and cannot be charged as interlocutory applications in an existing action. Since no express provision prescribes instructions fees for miscellaneous applications, they fall under 'other matters', where the minimum for defended proceedings is Kshs 75,000/=. The award of Kshs 30,000/= was therefore not supported by the Remuneration Order and amounted to an error in principle justifying the court's interference on the reference.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A reference under Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order filed within 14 days from the date of the taxing master's letter informing the dissatisfied party that the reasons for the decision are contained in the ruling is filed within time.
  • A miscellaneous application is a complete action in itself and falls under 'other matters' in Schedule 6 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, for which the minimum fee for defended actions is Kshs 75,000/=.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The taxation in respect of item 1 of the Bill of Costs is set aside
  2. 2.Item 1 of the Party and Party Bill of Costs is substituted with an award of Kshs 75,000/= as provided by the Remuneration Order
  3. 3.The rest of the Bill remains as taxed by the taxing master
  4. 4.The Reference is allowed
  5. 5.Each party to bear own costs of the Reference
Jurisdiction invoked
Reference under Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ogone v Oduor (Suing on Behalf of the Estate of Charles Evans Omondi - Deceased) (Miscellaneous Application E008 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 237 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/237/eng@2026-01-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.