Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in judgment

P. D. Onyango & Co. Advocates v Ogutu (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E016 of 2023) [2026] KEELC 2735 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
7 May 2026
1,568 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan High Court converted an advocate's unpaid fee certificate into a court judgment, adding 14% yearly interest — clients who ignore taxed costs risk enforced payment.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the High Court at Kisumu (E. Asati, J) on a Notice of Motion dated 11th September 2025 brought by Peter Onyango Daniel, Advocate, seeking conversion of a certificate of costs dated 15th February 2024 into a judgment and decree for Kshs. 347,550/-, together with interest at 14% per annum under paragraph 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order and costs of the application. The application was grounded on section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, section 26 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 50 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The Respondent opposed through grounds of opposition dated 5th March 2026, contending that there was a dispute as to retainer, that the application was procedurally defective, and that the claim for interest was unfounded because the Taxing Master had not awarded interest and interest was not sought in the Bill of Costs. The Respondent also urged referral to Alternative Dispute Resolution, describing himself as a retiree out of the country. The Applicant submitted that the reference against the taxation had been dismissed on 8th May 2025, that the grounds of opposition did not challenge the taxation, and that ADR was an afterthought. The court found no dispute that the bill had been taxed and certified, that the reference was dismissed, and that the certificate remained unsettled and unaltered; it noted the Respondent took no step after the dismissal of the reference. The court held that interest at 14% per annum was due on the taxed costs from the date of the certificate of costs until payment in full, since the date of delivery of the bill was not disclosed. The application was allowed in its entirety.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the certificate of costs dated 15th February 2024 should be converted into a judgment and decree of the court
  2. 2.Whether interest at 14% per annum is payable on the taxed costs and from what date
  3. 3.Whether the application is defeated by an alleged dispute as to retainer or procedural defects

Key legal issues

#
01

Conversion of a certificate of taxation into judgment under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act

Holding

The certificate of costs, unchallenged after dismissal of the reference, was converted into judgment for Kshs. 347,550/-

Reasoning

The court noted the bill was taxed and certified on 15th February 2024, the reference challenging taxation was dismissed on 8th May 2025, and no step has been taken by the Respondent to settle or further challenge the certificate. Section 51(2) empowers the court to enter judgment on the certified sum where the retainer is not disputed. The Respondent's opposition did not challenge the taxation itself, so the application had merit.

p. 3
02

Interest at 14% per annum under Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order and section 26 of the Civil Procedure Act

Holding

Interest at 14% per annum was awarded from the date of the certificate of costs until payment in full

Reasoning

Rule 7 permits an advocate to charge interest at 14% per annum from one month after delivery of the bill, provided the claim for interest is raised before payment or tender in full. Because the bill was not settled and went through taxation and certification, and the date the bill was forwarded to the Respondent was not disclosed, the court exercised its discretion to run interest at 14% from the date of the certificate of costs.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A certificate of costs that has not been set aside or altered is final and may be converted into judgment where the retainer is not effectively disputed
  • Interest under Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order runs at 14% per annum where the bill was not settled and the date of delivery of the bill is not disclosed, computed from the date of the certificate of costs

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The certificate of costs issued on 15th February 2024 is converted into a judgment and decree, and judgment entered for the Applicant against the Respondent for Kshs. 347,550/-
  2. 2.Interest accrues on Kshs. 347,550/- at 14% per annum with effect from 15th February 2024 until payment in full and final settlement
  3. 3.Costs of the application awarded to the Applicant/Advocate

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, Cap 16; Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order; Section 26 of the Civil Procedure Act; Order 50 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

The certificate of costs issued to the Applicant on 15th February, 2024, as against the Respondent, is hereby converted into a judgment and decree of this court
p. 4Final orders - conversion of certificate of costs
Interest accrues on the sum of Kshs. 347,550/- at the rate of 14% per annum with efiect from 15th February 2024, until payment in full and final settlement.
p. 4Final orders - interest
An Advocate may charge interest at 14 per cent per annum on his disbursement and costs, whether by scale or otherwise, from the expiration of one month from the delivery of his bill to the client
p. 3Rule 7 Advocates Remuneration Order - interest
Since the Reference was dismissed on 8th May, 2025, no step has been taken by the Respondent in respect of the certificate of costs either to settle it or challenge it in any other way.
p. 3Respondent's inaction on certificate

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

The case title/case number of the suit is not stated in the judgment text supplied; the document begins directly with the notice of motion

minor

The judgment recites that the bill of costs was taxed on 5th September 2024 while the certificate of costs is dated 15th February 2024, i.e. the certificate predates the stated taxation date

minor

Chronology inconsistency: grounds of opposition dated 5th March 2026 post-date the Supporting Affidavit of 12th September 2025 and the certificate of costs of 15th February 2024, while the ruling was delivered 7th May 2026; dates appear internally inconsistent with the reference dismissal on 8th May 2025

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "P. D. Onyango & Co. Advocates v Ogutu (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E016 of 2023) [2026] KEELC 2735 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/2735/eng@2026-05-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.