Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedELC 26/2018

Ndalo v Sireno (Environment and Land Appeal 26 of 2018) [2026] KEELC 4274 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
9 July 2026
383 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The court ordered Kshs.100,000 appeal security refunded, but only after the appellant produced the deposit and withdrawal orders to prove entitlement.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kisumu (E. Asati, J) determines a Notice of Motion dated 13th October, 2025 by the Appellant, Walter Asuwo Ndalo, seeking release of Kshs.100,000/- deposited as security pending the hearing of his appeal, pursuant to sections 1A, 3A and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act and article 159 of the Constitution. The grounds were that the appeal had been withdrawn on 8th September, 2025 and that no order for refund of the security was made when the appeal was withdrawn. A court deposit receipt (No. DCY-0001762) showed the sum was deposited by John Osuwo on 23rd August, 2023 on behalf of the applicant. When the matter came up on 7th May, 2026, counsel for the Respondent indicated the application was unopposed and prayed that the order of stay of execution be vacated. Although unopposed, the court noted it could not find on record the order directing the deposit of the security and stay of execution, nor a copy of the order withdrawing the appeal. It accordingly ordered release of the Kshs.100,000/- to the applicant upon identification, conditional on production of the deposit order and the withdrawal order. It further ordered that any stay of execution would lapse upon release, and made no order as to costs. The ruling is dated and signed at Kisumu and was read virtually on 9th July, 2026.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the Kshs.100,000/- deposited as security pending appeal should be released to the Appellant following withdrawal of the appeal

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court could order release of the deposited security despite absence on record of the orders directing the deposit and withdrawing the appeal

Holding

The court allowed release but imposed conditions requiring production of the deposit order and the withdrawal order

Reasoning

The application was unopposed and a deposit receipt showing Kshs.100,000/- deposited by John Osuwo on behalf of the applicant was on record. However, the court could not locate on record the order directing the deposit and stay of execution, nor a copy of the order withdrawing the appeal. It therefore granted the release conditionally on production of both orders, and provided that any stay of execution would lapse upon release.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Release of deposited security may be ordered conditionally upon production of the underlying court orders directing the deposit and withdrawing the appeal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Release of the amount of Kshs.100,000/- deposited by JOHN OSUWO to the applicant upon identification
  2. 2.Release conditional on the applicant producing a copy of the order that directed the deposit of the security amount and a copy of the court order withdrawing the appeal
  3. 3.Upon release of the security amount, the order of stay of execution, if any, shall lapse
  4. 4.No order as to costs

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 3A and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act; article 159 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

In the premises, I hereby order the release of the amount of Kshs.100,000/- deposited by JOHN OSUWO to the applicant upon identification
p. 2release of security deposit
Upon release of the security amount to the Applicant, the order of stay of execution, if any, granted herein shall lapse.
p. 2lapse of stay of execution
No order as to costs.
p. 2costs

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

Duplicate phrase in the ruling text regarding the missing order

minor

Name of the Respondent not stated in the judgment text

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ndalo v Sireno (Environment and Land Appeal 26 of 2018) [2026] KEELC 4274 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). ELC 26/2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/4274/eng@2026-07-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.