Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNotice of Motion dated 12th March 2026 (ELC suit, Mombasa)

Mleka v Shewe (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E007 of 2026) [2026] KEELC 4744 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
23 July 2026
1,472 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Mombasa court allowed a Kenyan litigant to serve court papers by newspaper ad, but only if they also try phone, email, and post first.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling on a Notice of Motion dated 12th March 2026 seeking leave to serve pleadings on a respondent who could not be traced, by advertisement in the Daily Nation or the Standard newspaper. The application was brought under Order 5 rule 17 and Order 51 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, and sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, supported by an affidavit of the applicant's advocate, Kipkurui Ngeno Birir, and a process server's affidavit of non-service sworn by George Otieno. The process server deponed that from 29th January 2026 he made physical visits to Plot Msamwe Mbelegeza/1207, made neighbourhood inquiries, and checked at the Lands Office for the respondent's address, all without success. The court reviewed Order 5 rule 17 and followed Musyoka & 2 others v Munguti & 2 others [2023] KEELC 473 (KLR) and the Court of Appeal decision in Maina v Langat & 2 others [2024] KECA 395 (KLR), confirming that substituted service is a secondary remedy available after all reasonable efforts to trace a party fail. Importantly, the court added its own guidance: substituted service should not issue on bare generalities, and courts should favour graduated alternatives, including electronic and physical channels, before resorting to newspaper advertisement alone. Satisfied that diligent efforts had been made, the court granted leave for substituted service by advertisement, but also required supplementary service by SMS, WhatsApp, email, registered post or physical delivery where any last known contact is available, an affidavit of compliance, and fixed thirty days for entry of appearance. Costs were made costs in the cause. The application was thus allowed on modified terms rather than exactly as prayed.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the applicant has demonstrated diligent efforts to effect personal service on the respondent
  2. 2.Whether leave should issue for substituted service by newspaper advertisement, and on what terms and modes

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether substituted service by advertisement was merited

Holding

Allowed, with additional graduated modes of service

Reasoning

The process server made physical visits to the plot, neighbourhood inquiries and a registry follow-up at the Lands Office, all without success. The court found these efforts more than perfunctory and was satisfied personal service could not be effected. However, applying its own gloss on Order 5 rule 17, it required that newspaper advertisement be supplemented by any last known electronic or physical channels of contact, and fixed a 30-day appearance period, with an affidavit of compliance to be filed.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An order for substituted service should not issue on bare generalities; the applicant must demonstrate specific, chronological and diligent efforts at personal service, and the proposed mode must be reasonably likely to bring the suit to the respondent's notice.
  • Substituted service is a secondary remedy resorted to only after all reasonable and proper efforts to trace the respondent have failed.
  • Procedure must remain the servant of justice; courts should favour graduated alternatives calculated to bring proceedings to the attention of the person to be served before resort to newspaper advertisement alone.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave granted to serve the respondent by substituted service through advertisement in either the Daily Nation or the Standard newspaper, in a reasonably sized and conspicuous part of the paper
  2. 2.In addition to the advertisement, the applicant shall transmit the pleadings or a notice of the suit by any available last known contact: SMS, WhatsApp, email, registered post, or delivery at last known residence or place of business
  3. 3.An affidavit of compliance shall be filed exhibiting the newspaper advertisement and any available proof of transmission or attempted transmission through the additional modes
  4. 4.The respondent shall enter appearance within thirty (30) days from the date of publication of the advertisement, failing which the matter may proceed in accordance with the law
  5. 5.Costs of the application shall be in the cause

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Order 5 rule 17 and Order 51 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010; sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act

Relief refused

#

Service of all pleadings by advertisement alone as sought

The court required graduated additional modes of service beyond newspaper advertisement

p. 3

Appearance within 15 days as sought

The court fixed 30 days from publication instead of the 15 days sought

p. 4

Costs of the application to the applicant

Costs were made costs in the cause rather than awarded to the applicant

p. 4

Costs

Costs of the application shall be in the cause.

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

The applicant is hereby granted leave to serve upon the respondent by way of substituted service through advertisement in either the Daily Nation or the Standard newspaper, in a reasonably sized and conspicuous part of the paper.
p. 3final orders - leave for substituted service
In an age when people may be easier found through a telephone number, an email address, a messaging application, a relative, an agent, or a last known residence than through a formal knock on the door, procedure must remain the servant of justice and not its jailer.
p. 3graduated substituted service
The respondent shall enter appearance within thirty (30) days from the date of publication of the advertisement, in default of which the matter may proceed in accordance with the law.
p. 4appearance period
Costs of the application shall be in the cause.
p. 4costs

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

The judgment text contains OCR-style rendering errors (e.g. 'efiort' for 'effort', 'afidavit' for 'affidavit', 'Lands Ofice', 'afixing'); quotes are reproduced character-for-character from the provided text.

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mleka v Shewe (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E007 of 2026) [2026] KEELC 4744 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Notice of Motion dated 12th March 2026 (ELC suit, Mombasa). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/4744/eng@2026-07-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.