Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutELC Land Appeal No. E010 of 2026

Absa Bank Kenya PLC v Benedict Simeon Ondieki Nyatangi

Environment and Land Court
24 September 2026
2,867 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court struck out Absa Bank's appeal, confirming it cannot hear mortgage and property sale disputes—those belong to the High Court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Absa Bank Kenya PLC appealed to the Environment and Land Court at Eldoret against a ruling of the magistrates' court (Hon. P.N. Areri, 26 March 2026) which had granted Benedict Simeon Ondieki Nyatangi a temporary injunction restraining the bank from exercising its statutory power of sale over L.R. No. Pioneer Ngeria/Block 1 (EATEC)/443, charged to secure a loan facility. The bank also moved for a stay of proceedings in the subordinate suit, Eldoret MCELC Case No. E178 of 2025, contending the appeal would be rendered nugatory and that the respondent was in default of a debt of Kshs. 3,678,717.45. The respondent opposed, denying default and arguing that stay of proceedings is a draconian remedy granted only in exceptional circumstances. The court, C.K. Yano J, framed three issues, the threshold one being its own jurisdiction. Relying on the binding Court of Appeal decisions in Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd v Patrick Kangethe Njuguna and Bank of Africa v TSS Investment, the court held that a charge is a disposition of land, not a use of land, and that the ELC has no jurisdiction over disputes concerning charges, mortgages, loan accounts or the exercise of statutory power of sale, which fall within the High Court's civil jurisdiction. Section 13 of the ELC Act and section 150 of the Land Act make no provision for such matters. Accordingly, the court struck out both the Notice of Motion dated 15 April 2026 and the Memorandum of Appeal for want of jurisdiction, and ordered each party to bear its own costs.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether this court is vested with the requisite jurisdiction to hear and determine the present application as well as the appeal filed herein
  2. 2.Whether an Order for Stay of Proceedings can issue against the proceedings known as Eldoret MCELC Case No. E178 of 2025
  3. 3.Who shall bear the costs of the present Application

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELC over chargee-chargor disputes

Holding

The ELC has no jurisdiction over disputes on charges, loan accounts and statutory power of sale; such matters fall outside Article 162(2)(b) and section 13 of the ELC Act

Reasoning

Relying on the binding Court of Appeal decision in Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd v Patrick Kangethe Njuguna, the court held that a charge is a disposition of land, not a use of land. Section 13 of the ELC Act and section 150 of the Land Act make no provision for enforcement of a charge or exercise of statutory power of sale; such disputes fall within the High Court's civil jurisdiction. The court was therefore bound to strike out the appeal and application.

p. 14
02

Whether stay of proceedings in the subordinate court could issue

Holding

Not determined on the merits; the application was struck out for want of jurisdiction

Reasoning

Having found no jurisdiction over the appeal, the court did not reach the merits of the stay of proceedings application. The second issue became moot once the threshold jurisdictional finding was made, and the application and appeal were both struck out.

p. 15

Legal principles established

#
  • The Environment and Land Court lacks jurisdiction over disputes relating to charges, mortgages or the exercise of the statutory power of sale, which fall within the High Court's civil jurisdiction
  • A court without jurisdiction must down its tools; jurisdiction flows only from the Constitution or statute

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion Application dated 15th April, 2026 is struck out
  2. 2.The appeal vide the Memorandum of Appeal dated 15th April, 2026 is struck out for want of jurisdiction
  3. 3.Each party to bear its own costs of the present Application as well as the Appeal

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

On appeal from
Magistrates' Court at Eldoret
Eldoret MCELC Case No. E178 of 2025
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) and (3) of the Constitution and section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Relief refused

#

Stay of all further proceedings in Eldoret MCELC Case No. E178 of 2025 pending appeal

The court lacked jurisdiction over the appeal and application, as the dispute concerns a charge and statutory power of sale, not land use

p. 14

Costs

Each party to bear its own costs of the present Application as well as the Appeal.

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

Where a court of law finds that it lacks the requisite jurisdiction to entertain and/or hear and determine a suit then the court is duty bound to down its tools.
p. 7Jurisdiction - duty to down tools
the Environment and Land Court is not vested with the jurisdiction to entertain disputes relating to charges, mortgages or the exercise of the statutory power of sale.
p. 14ELC jurisdiction over charge disputes
this court finds that the Notice of Motion Application dated 15th April, 2025 is not merited and is hereby Struck Out.
p. 15Final orders - striking out application
Similarly, the appeal vide the Memorandum of Appeal dated 15th April, 2026 be and is hereby Struck Out for want of jurisdiction.
p. 15Final orders - striking out appeal
Each party to bear its own costs of the present Application as well as the Appeal.
p. 15Final orders - costs

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

Date of the Notice of Motion inconsistently stated as 2026 and 2025

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Absa Bank Kenya PLC v Benedict Simeon Ondieki Nyatangi", Case Analysis (2026). ELC Land Appeal No. E010 of 2026. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/5722/eng@2026-09-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.