Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedPetition (Notice of Motion dated 4th November 2015)· [2015] KEELRC 77 (KLR)

Kenya Association of Private Employment Agencies through Fabian K. Muli & another v Cabinet Secretary Ministry For Labour Social Security & Services & 2 others [2015] KEELRC 77 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
18 December 2015
1,256 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court refused broad protection for recruitment agencies but ordered police to return seized passports to their owners.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioners, an umbrella society of over 55 private employment agencies and an individual employment agency, moved the Court by Notice of Motion dated 4th November 2015 seeking conservatory orders restraining the Respondents from invading their premises, searching or seizing their goods or harassing them, and an order for the return of goods and effects allegedly taken from their Embassy House offices on 30th October 2015. They alleged that police and hired goons, purporting to enforce the 1st Respondent's suspension of accreditation licences for private recruitment agencies, raided their offices, seized equipment, and threatened staff, in violation of Article 47(1) of the Constitution and Section 4(2) of the Fair Administrative Action Act. The Respondents, through the Principal Secretary Ali Noor Ismail, explained that the Ministry licences and regulates private employment agencies; that following public outcry over the mistreatment of Kenyan migrant workers in the Middle East and Gulf, it imposed a recruitment ban in September 2014, revoked all accreditation licences, and set up a task force and an inter-ministerial vetting committee under the Security Laws (Amendment) Act. The court found the only issue was whether a case for interim orders was made out. It held that granting prayers identical to the main petition would determine the petition at the interlocutory stage, an abuse of process, and that the seized property was not adequately described. It ordered only the release of seized passports to holders upon proof of ownership, dismissed the rest of the application with no order for costs, and set aside the interim orders of 10th December 2015.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Petitioners established a case for interim conservatory orders

Holding

The application failed because the prayers mirrored the substantive petition and the seized property was not adequately described.

Reasoning

The court held that granting orders identical to the main petition's prayers would pre-empt and determine the petition at the interlocutory stage, amounting to an abuse of process. Further, the supporting material did not describe the seized property, and the only verified item was the passports, which were addressed by a limited release order. The court therefore dismissed the remainder of the application and set aside interim orders earlier issued on 10th December 2015.

p. 3
02

Release of passports allegedly confiscated by police

Holding

The court ordered release of the passports directly to holders upon proof of ownership.

Reasoning

The supporting affidavit and supplementary affidavit deponed that passports were confiscated by police on 30th October 2015 and that PC Chesebe stated they would only be released on the strength of a court order. The court accommodated this limited relief by ordering release to holders on adequate proof of ownership, without granting the broader conservatory or return-of-goods orders sought.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Interim relief mirroring the prayers in the main petition cannot be granted, as this would amount to deciding the petition at the interlocutory stage and would constitute an abuse of process.
  • A party seeking interim orders must provide an adequate description of the property the subject of the relief.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.That any passports held by the police be released directly to the holders upon adequate proof of ownership
  2. 2.The rest of the application is dismissed with no order for costs
  3. 3.The interim orders granted on 10th December 2015 are set aside

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 47(1)
  • Fair Administrative Action ActSection 4(2)
  • Security Laws (Amendment) ActNo. 19 of 2014
Jurisdiction invoked
Constitution of Kenya, 2010 (petition invoking Article 47(1) and Article 23 jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Association of Private Employment Agencies through Fabian K. Muli & another v Cabinet Secretary Ministry For Labour Social Security & Services & 2 others [2015] KEELRC 77 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Petition (Notice of Motion dated 4th November 2015). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/77/eng@2015-12-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.