Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2019] KEELRC 26 (KLR)

Simon Wachie Wakwabubi v Erdemann Company (K) Limited [2019] KEELRC 26 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
19 December 2019
963 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that firing a sick worker who couldn't notify his employer was unfair, awarding him Kshs.248,150.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, employed orally as a carpenter from 04.04.2016 to 11.09.2017 at a monthly salary of Kshs.21,000.00, sued the respondent for a declaration that his dismissal was unfair, notice pay, untaken leave pay, house allowance, overtime, service gratuity and 12 months' compensation. His unchallenged evidence was that he fell sick on Sunday 10.09.2017, could not notify the employer as he lacked its telephone number, and on resuming duty on 11.09.2017 was told by the foreman that he stood dismissed on account of the absence. The respondent did not enter appearance or file a response despite service. The court found the claimant entitled to paid sick leave under section 30(1) of the Employment Act, 2007, and that he acted reasonably in notifying the employer at the earliest opportunity; the summary dismissal was therefore unjustified and unfair for want of due process under section 41 and want of a genuine reason under section 43. Weighing his 1 year 5 months of service, the court awarded 6 months' gross salaries (Kshs.126,000.00) as compensation, one month's pay in lieu of notice under section 35, service gratuity of Kshs.17,850.00, Kshs.29,750.00 leave pay under section 28, and Kshs.53,550.00 house allowance under section 31. The overtime claim failed for want of proof of working hours and overtime rates. Judgment was entered for the claimant for Kshs.248,150.00 payable by 01.02.2020, failing which interest at court rates would run from the date of judgment until full payment, together with costs of the suit.

Key legal issues

#
01

Fairness of the summary dismissal during sickness

Holding

The termination was unfair for want of due process under section 41 and want of a genuine reason under section 43 of the Employment Act, 2007

Reasoning

The claimant fell sick on 10.09.2017, had not been given the respondent's telephone number, and notified the foreman the following day on resuming duty. He was therefore not absent without reasonable cause. The dismissal was abrupt, without notice or hearing, and without a genuine reason, contrary to sections 41 and 43 of the Employment Act, 2007.

p. 2
02

Entitlement to pay in lieu of notice, service pay and leave

Holding

Claimant awarded one month's pay in lieu of notice under section 35, service pay of Kshs.17,850.00 under section 35, and Kshs.29,750.00 leave pay under section 28

Reasoning

The court considered the 1 year 5 months of service and awarded 6 months' gross salaries as compensation, plus contractual notice pay, service pay in lieu of NSSF membership absent alternative pension arrangements, and untaken annual leave as prayed for under the respective statutory provisions.

p. 2
03

House allowance

Holding

Kshs.53,550.00 awarded as reasonable provision for housing since the agreed pay could not be inclusive of housing and the claimant was not housed

Reasoning

Under section 31 of the Employment Act the court found the monthly pay of Kshs.21,000.00 could not include a reasonable provision for housing, and the respondent neither housed the claimant nor paid house allowance, so the claim as prayed was awarded.

p. 2
04

Overtime claim

Holding

Prayer failed because the claimant did not establish agreed or statutory working hours or the overtime pay rate

Reasoning

The claimant testified he worked 2 extra hours daily, but produced no evidence of the agreed or statutory working hours or overtime rate. The claim was not anchored on rest days so section 27 of the Act could not be invoked. The prayer therefore failed.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An employee on paid sick leave who cannot notify the employer of illness as soon as reasonably practicable, through no fault of his own, is not culpable of absence without reasonable cause and summary dismissal on that account is unjustified and unfair for want of due process and genuine reason.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the termination of the claimant's employment by the respondent was unfair
  2. 2.Respondent to pay the claimant Kshs.248,150.00 by 01.02.2020, failing interest at Court rates from the date of judgment till full payment
  3. 3.Respondent to pay the claimant's costs of the suit
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act, 2007 (first-instance employment claim)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Simon Wachie Wakwabubi v Erdemann Company (K) Limited [2019] KEELRC 26 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2019/26/eng@2019-12-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.