Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutNot stated in the judgment (Statement of Claim dated 13th February 2017, filed 1st March 2017)· [2020] KEELRC 634 (KLR)

Solomon Atuti Ombwori v Freight In Time Limited [2020] KEELRC 634 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
9 April 2020
1,093 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court struck out an unfair dismissal claim filed nearly six years late, confirming criminal cases do not pause the three-year filing deadline.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an employment dispute before the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Machakos. The Claimant, employed by the Respondent as a Freight Clerk from 1st June 2004, was dismissed on 29th July 2011 following the theft of a client's Toyota Land Cruiser from the Respondent's premises. He was charged in Criminal Case No. 2328 of 2011 and acquitted under Section 215 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He claimed notice pay, salary for 33 months, accrued leave, gratuity, compensation for unfair termination, a certificate of service, costs and interest, contending the dismissal was without investigation, valid reason or due process. The Respondent maintained the termination was lawful and fair, being founded on breach of trust, and objected that the Claimant need not have waited for the criminal case before suing. The Court identified limitation as the threshold question: the termination occurred on 29th July 2011 but the claim was filed on 1st March 2017, far outside the three-year period under Section 90 of the Employment Act. Following the Court of Appeal in Attorney General & another v Andrew Maina Githinji & another [2016] eKLR, the Court held that pending criminal proceedings do not suspend limitation for employment claims. The claim was found time barred, outside the Court's jurisdiction, and was struck out with no order for costs. Judgment was delivered electronically pursuant to COVID-19 measures.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the claim was statute-barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act

Holding

The claim, filed nearly six years after termination, was way outside the three-year limitation period and the Court had no jurisdiction to entertain it

Reasoning

The Claimant pleaded termination on 29th July 2011 but filed his claim on 1st March 2017, well beyond the three-year period prescribed by Section 90 of the Employment Act. Limitation goes to jurisdiction. He admitted filing late, ostensibly because he was awaiting the outcome of criminal charges. The Court held the delay was not excusable and that the claim was time barred.

02

Whether pendency of criminal proceedings suspends the limitation period for an employment claim

Holding

No - criminal proceedings on the same facts do not halt the running of time for filing an employment claim

Reasoning

Relying on the Court of Appeal decision in Attorney General & another v Andrew Maina Githinji & another [2016] eKLR, the Court held that a claimant has all the material needed to plead a cause of action without waiting for the outcome of criminal proceedings on the same facts. The Claimant's explanation for the delay was therefore legally unavailing.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A claimant in an employment matter has all the material required to display a cause of action without having to wait for the outcome of criminal proceedings arising from the same facts
  • The pendency of criminal proceedings cannot cure an otherwise time-barred employment claim

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Claimant's claim is struck out
  2. 2.No order for costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment Act, Section 90 (limitation period for employment claims)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Solomon Atuti Ombwori v Freight In Time Limited [2020] KEELRC 634 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Not stated in the judgment (Statement of Claim dated 13th February 2017, filed 1st March 2017). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2020/634/eng@2020-04-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.