Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2021] KEELRC 276 (KLR)

Roto Moulders Limited v Josphat Ontomwa Mogoba [2021] KEELRC 276 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
18 November 2021
850 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court let a late employment appeal proceed, but made the applicant pay auctioneers' costs because she ignored a stay condition.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant filed an application dated 21st September 2021 seeking stay of execution of the decree dated 25th June 2021 and leave to file an appeal out of time against a lower court judgment in which the respondent was awarded compensation and costs. The applicant, through Mary Kagumu, explained that counsel fell ill after judgment, an earlier application for stay in the lower court could not be heard because the file went missing, and typed proceedings and judgment were not supplied in good time. The respondent did not oppose the grant of leave but insisted that, absent any stay, he had lawfully instructed auctioneers to execute and the applicant should bear the attendant costs. The court applied Rule 8 of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2016 and Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act, which permit admission of an appeal out of time on good and sufficient cause, and found good cause to extend time, allowing the applicant 14 days to file and serve the appeal. However, the court declined to shield the applicant from the consequences of execution: the decree had existed since 25th June 2021, no stay was in force until the interim orders of 23rd September 2021, and the applicant had not complied with the direction to deposit the decretal sum. The respondent's execution was held proper, valid and justified. The conditional stay of 23rd September 2021 was to be complied with within 14 days failing which it would lapse, and the applicant was ordered to pay the auctioneers' costs and the costs of the application to the respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Extension of time to file appeal

Holding

Leave to file the appeal out of time was granted, the court finding good cause based on counsel's illness, the missing file and delayed typed proceedings.

Reasoning

Rule 8 of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2016 requires appeals to be filed within 30 days, mirroring Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act which permits admission out of time on good and sufficient cause. The court accepted the applicant's explanation of counsel's illness, a missing court file and delayed supply of typed proceedings and judgment as constituting good cause, and granted 14 days to file and serve the appeal.

p. 2
02

Stay of execution and costs of execution

Holding

Stay was not granted unconditionally; the earlier conditional stay (deposit of decretal sum) remained uncomplied with, so execution by the respondent was proper and the applicant must pay auctioneer's costs.

Reasoning

The applicant's excuse regarding the Deputy Registrar's failure to assess the decretal sum was rejected because the decree was dated 25th June 2021, before the application. Since no stay was in place until the interim orders of 23rd September 2021, the respondent was entitled to commence execution. The court held the applicant, as judgment debtor, must meet the attendant auctioneer's costs and comply with the conditional stay within 14 days or the order lapses.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal may be admitted out of time if the appellant satisfies the court that he had good and sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave to appeal out of time is allowed and the applicant given 14 days to file and serve the appeal
  2. 2.The conditional stay allowed on 23rd September 2021 shall be complied with within the same time failure to which the order shall lapse
  3. 3.The applicant shall pay auctioneers costs together with costs of this application to the respondent
On appeal from
Lower court (not specified in judgment)
Not stated in judgment
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 8 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016 and Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act (extension of time to appeal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Roto Moulders Limited v Josphat Ontomwa Mogoba [2021] KEELRC 276 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/276/eng@2021-11-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.