Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutNot stated in judgment· [2023] KEELRC 391 (KLR)

Ndegwa v Mount Kenya University (Cause E563 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 391 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
9 February 2023
538 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court struck out a lecturer's Kshs 719,150 unpaid salary claim because it was filed over ten years late — employment claims must be filed within three years.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, employed by the respondent in 2009 as a part-time lecturer in the School of Health Sciences, sued on July 12, 2021 claiming Kshs 719,150 in unpaid salary for units and classes taught between 2009 and 2011, for which he said he filled claim forms but was never paid. He sought an order for payment of the amount due. The respondent filed a notice of preliminary objection dated 17th December, 2021 contending that the court lacked jurisdiction because the suit was statute barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, which prescribes a three-year limitation period for employment contract claims. The court found the facts in the plaint undisputed: the cause of action arose between 2009 and 2011, and the suit was filed more than ten years later. Relying on the Court of Appeal decision in Attorney General and Another vs Andrew Maina Githinji and Another (2015 eKLR) and its own decision in Maxwell Sifuna vs Teachers Service Commission (2022 eKLR), the court held that the Section 90 limitation bar is jurisdictional and not discretionary, leaving the court no choice but to down its tools. The suit was struck out as time barred by a long margin, with no order as to costs. Judgment was delivered virtually at Nairobi on 9th February, 2023 by Mathews N. Nduma, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit is time barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007

Holding

Yes. The cause of action arose between 2009 and 2011 but the suit was filed on July 12, 2021, more than ten years later, far outside the three-year limitation period.

Reasoning

The facts in the plaint were not in dispute: the claimant taught and submitted claim forms between 2009 and 2011 but was not paid. Under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, employment claims must be brought within three years of the cause of action arising. The limitation bar is jurisdictional, not discretionary, so the court cannot entertain the claim however meritorious and must strike it out.

p. 1
02

Whether the preliminary objection on limitation and jurisdiction should be upheld

Holding

Yes. The notice of preliminary objection dated 17th December, 2021 was upheld and the suit struck out.

Reasoning

The respondent objected that the court lacked jurisdiction because the suit was statute barred under Section 90. Relying on its own precedent and that of the Court of Appeal, the court held that limitation under Section 90 is jurisdictional and the court has no discretion but to down its tools. The suit was struck out with no order as to costs.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007 imposes a three-year limitation period for claims arising from employment contracts, and once expired the court lacks jurisdiction and must strike out the suit.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The suit is struck out for being time barred and for want of jurisdiction
  2. 2.No order as to costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 90, Employment Act, 2007 (limitation ousting jurisdiction)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ndegwa v Mount Kenya University (Cause E563 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 391 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/391/eng@2023-02-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.