Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in judgment· [2023] KEELRC 3025 (KLR)

Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union v Nyanza Club (Cause E004 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 3025 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
23 November 2023
904 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court dismissed a bid to strike out an application, ruling that preliminary objections must be pure points of law, not disputed facts.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This interlocutory ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu (Christine N. Baari, J) dealt with the Claimant's preliminary objection dated 15th October 2023, seeking to strike out the Respondent's application dated 29th September 2023 for want of jurisdiction. The Claimant, through Mr John Simiyu, argued that the Respondent's application sought an impermissible second review of the court's orders, relying on rule 33(6) of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules and Brian Muchiri Waihenya v. Jubilee Hauliers Co. Ltd, and contended that the court should 'down its tools'. The Respondent opposed, submitting that a preliminary objection must be a pure point of law and that the issues required ascertainment of facts; further, the application sought review of the 26th September 2023 dismissal orders for the first time. The court invoked Owners of Motor Vessel Lilian 'S' v Caltex Oil on the centrality of jurisdiction and Mukisa Biscuit on the definition of a preliminary objection. It found that the April 2023 orders (instalment payment of the decretal sum) were distinct from the dismissal orders of the 31st July 2023 application, which had never been reviewed; hence no second review was in issue, and the objection raised factual matters. The preliminary objection failed the Mukisa Biscuit threshold and was dismissed with costs, with the Respondent's application set for hearing on merit and priority basis.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court had jurisdiction to entertain the Respondent's application dated 29th September, 2023

Holding

The court found no prior review of the 26th September 2023 dismissal orders existed, so the application was not a second review; jurisdiction was not ousted

Reasoning

The Claimant argued the 29th September 2023 application sought review of orders already reviewed on 27th April 2023, invoking rule 33(6) and Brian Muchiri Waihenya v. Jubilee Hauliers. The court distinguished the two: the April orders allowed instalment payment of the decretal sum, whereas the September application targeted the dismissal of the 31st July 2023 application for non-attendance, which had never been reviewed.

p. 2
02

Whether the preliminary objection met the Mukisa Biscuit threshold

Holding

It did not; it raised factual issues requiring ascertainment

Reasoning

Relying on Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd, the court held a preliminary objection must be a pure point of law pleaded or arising by clear implication, and cannot be raised where facts must be ascertained or discretion exercised. The Claimant's contentions required determination of facts about which orders were sought and previously reviewed.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A preliminary objection must raise a pure point of law and cannot be raised where facts need to be ascertained or where judicial discretion is sought
  • Jurisdiction is central; a court without jurisdiction must down its tools

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Claimant's preliminary objection dated 15th October, 2023 is dismissed with costs to the Respondent
  2. 2.The Respondent's application dated 29th September, 2023 to be set for hearing on merit and on priority basis
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, rule 33(6)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union v Nyanza Club (Cause E004 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 3025 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/3025/eng@2023-11-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.