Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedNot stated in the ruling

Githinji v Elsamere Conservation Centre (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E032 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1604 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
26 June 2024
650 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by Hellen Wasilwa, Judge, deals with a notice of motion dated 9th May, 2024 brought by the Respondent/Applicant under Order 42 Rule 6 and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, seeking stay of execution of a judgment delivered on 30th April, 2024 and all consequential orders pending the hearing and determination of the Applicant's intended appeal. In a supporting affidavit sworn on 9th May, 2024, David Ndung'u, the manager of the Applicant, deposed that a Notice of Appeal had been lodged, that proceedings had been requested by letter dated 7th May, 2024, that the appeal was arguable, and that without stay the appeal would be rendered nugatory and the Applicant would suffer substantial loss. The application was heard orally on 3rd June, 2024. Gatei Advocate for the Applicant offered to deposit the entire decretal sum in court as security; Githinji Advocate for the Respondent sought half the decretal sum released to the Respondent and half deposited in court. Both parties agreed that stay should issue but differed on conditions. The court observed that no response to the application had been filed despite service, and that if stay was not granted the substratum of the appeal would be rendered nugatory. Exercising its discretion, the court allowed stay on condition that the Applicant deposits the entire decretal sum in court within 30 days, in default execution to proceed. Costs were ordered in the cause. The ruling was delivered virtually on 26th June, 2024.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 30th April, 2024 pending the intended appeal should be granted, and on what conditions

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether to grant stay of execution of the judgment of 30th April, 2024 pending the Applicant's intended appeal

Holding

Stay granted on condition that the Applicant deposits the entire decretal sum in court within 30 days, failing which execution may proceed

Reasoning

The court noted the application was unopposed despite service, that the Applicant had filed a Notice of Appeal and was willing to abide by conditions including depositing the entire decretal sum. The parties agreed on stay but disagreed on conditions. Balancing the parties' positions, the court granted stay conditioned on full deposit of the decretal sum as security for due performance.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Stay of execution pending appeal is a discretionary relief that may be granted on terms, including security by deposit of the decretal sum, where the appeal would otherwise be rendered nugatory

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 30th April, 2024 and all consequential orders granted pending the hearing and determination of the Applicant's appeal
  2. 2.Stay conditional upon the Applicant depositing the entire decretal sum in court within 30 days from the date of the order, in default execution may proceed
  3. 3.Costs in the cause

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Order 42 Rule 6 and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and all enabling provisions of the law

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

I therefore exercise my discretion and allow stay on the grounds that the Applicant deposits the entire decretal sum in court within 30 days from the date of this order in default execution may proceed. Costs in the cause.
p. 2Final orders - conditional stay of execution
The applicant has already filed a Notice of Appeal and if the stay is not granted, the substratum of the appeal may be rendered nugatory.
p. 2Reasons for granting stay
Therefore, that the parties agreed for the stay of execution to be granted, save that they did not agree on the conditions of stay of execution.
p. 2Common position of the parties

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

The ruling inconsistently describes the same advocate's representation, listing Gatei as acting for the Applicant and later as appearing for the Respondent/Applicant

minor

The affidavit is internally inconsistent as to which party would suffer execution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Githinji v Elsamere Conservation Centre (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E032 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1604 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the ruling. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1604/eng@2024-06-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.