Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in the judgment· [2024] KEELRC 2287 (KLR)

Maina v Kenya Commercial Bank PLC & another (Constitutional Petition E003 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2287 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
26 September 2024
3,422 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled that an arbitration clause in an employment contract cannot block a worker's constitutional claims in court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioner, formerly employed by the 1st Respondent, challenged the non-renewal of his contract of service and accused the 2nd Respondent (the Central Bank of Kenya) of failing in its regulatory oversight. The 1st Respondent applied by a notice dated 24th March 2023 for a stay of proceedings and referral of the dispute to arbitration under clause 22 of the employment contract. The Petitioner opposed, arguing the application breached section 6 of the Arbitration Act, that constitutional questions are not arbitrable, that the 2nd Respondent is not a party to the arbitration agreement, and that the 1st Respondent was estopped from invoking arbitration after ignoring negotiation requests. The court framed two issues: whether an arbitration clause ousts the court's jurisdiction, and whether the dispute should be referred to arbitration. It held that arbitration agreements do not oust judicial jurisdiction, such ouster being void as contrary to public policy, but that courts should defer to party autonomy by staying proceedings. However, referral was refused for two reasons: the 2nd Respondent is not a party to the arbitration agreement and cannot be compelled to arbitrate, and the Petitioner alleges constitutional violations which, per the Supreme Court in Bia Tosha, fall outside arbitral jurisdiction and entitle him to his day in court. The court also noted the tension between party autonomy and the interventionist public policy protecting employees from unequal bargaining power. The application dated 24th March 2023 was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an arbitration clause ousts the court's jurisdiction

Holding

No — arbitration agreements do not oust court jurisdiction; proceedings are stayed pending arbitration rather than struck out.

Reasoning

As a matter of public policy, private agreements cannot oust judicial jurisdiction; such attempts are void. Arbitration complements court process under party autonomy, and the law requires a stay of proceedings pending arbitration rather than striking out, preserving the court's supervisory role.

p. 4
02

Whether the dispute should be referred to arbitration

Holding

No — the petition alleges constitutional violations and joins a non-party to the arbitration agreement.

Reasoning

Section 6 of the Arbitration Act permits referral only of parties to the arbitration agreement; the 2nd Respondent (Central Bank of Kenya) is not a party. Further, per Bia Tosha (SC), constitutional breaches fall outside arbitral jurisdiction, entitling the Petitioner to his day in court. Considerations of unequal bargaining power in employment also weigh against referral.

p. 7
03

Timeliness of the application under section 6 of the Arbitration Act

Holding

Raised by the Petitioner as a ground of opposition but not determined by the court.

Reasoning

The Petitioner contended the application, filed over two months after entering appearance, violated section 6's requirement that the application be lodged not later than when the party enters appearance. The court did not resolve this issue, dismissing the application on other grounds.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An arbitration clause does not oust the jurisdiction of the court; attempts to do so by private agreement are void as contrary to public policy.
  • An arbitration agreement can only be enforced against parties to it; it is void and inoperative against non-parties.
  • Where a dispute transcends the contractual into the constitutional sphere, the party is entitled to their day in court despite an arbitration clause.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 24th March 2023 seeking stay of proceedings and referral to arbitration is dismissed.
  2. 2.No order as to costs.
Jurisdiction invoked
Constitutional petition alleging violation of fair labour practices; application under section 6 of the Arbitration Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Maina v Kenya Commercial Bank PLC & another (Constitutional Petition E003 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2287 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/2287/eng@2024-09-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.