Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedJudicial Review Application (ELRC, Nairobi)

Republic v Board of Directors, Agriculture & Food Authority & 3 others; Gikonyo (Nuts and Oil Crops Directorate) & 6 others (Interested Parties); Kiume (Exparte Applicant) (Judicial Review Application E027 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 2701 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
30 October 2024
1,346 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 1st respondent filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 24.06.2024 seeking dismissal of the ex parte applicant's judicial review application challenging the Organizational Structure, Grading and Staff Establishment Policy of AFA. It argued that the ELRC lacked jurisdiction because no employer-employee relationship existed between the applicant and the respondents, and that a litigant invoking Article 258 of the Constitution before the ELRC must bring themselves within section 12 of the ELRC Act. The applicant opposed, contending the objection did not constitute a pure point of law and involved disputed facts. Relying principally on the Supreme Court's decision in Kenya Tea Growers Association v NSSF Board of Trustees, the Court held that although ELRC jurisdiction is limited as to disputes and parties, section 12(2) of the ELRC Act contemplates strategic and public interest litigation, permitting applications by or against a broad range of parties. The impugned policy was a human resource instrument with direct impact on employment and labour relations in the public service, placing the dispute squarely within the Court's jurisdiction. Authorities requiring proof of an employer-employee relationship were held inconsistent with section 12(2), and the Supreme Court's holding prevailed. The Court found the applicant had established standing and dismissed the preliminary objection with costs in the cause, directing parties to take directions towards expeditious hearing of the petition.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the preliminary objection meets the threshold of a pure point of law
  2. 2.Whether the ELRC has jurisdiction over the judicial review application challenging a human resource policy not arising from a direct employer-employee relationship
  3. 3.Whether the ex parte applicant has standing under Article 258 of the Constitution to institute the proceedings before the ELRC

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the ELRC has jurisdiction where the dispute does not arise from a strict employer-employee relationship

Holding

The ELRC has jurisdiction where the subject matter, though not strictly an employer-employee dispute, relates to employment and labour relations, including human resource policies with direct impact on employment in the public service.

Reasoning

Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Kenya Tea Growers Association, the Court held that the ELRC may entertain disputes touching on labour relations broadly, and that section 12(2) permits applications by or against a range of parties beyond strict employees and employers. The impugned policy was a human resource instrument with direct impact on employment and labour relations, placing the matter squarely within section 12(2) and within the Supreme Court's holdings.

p. 4
02

Whether the ex parte applicant has standing to litigate under Article 258 before the ELRC

Holding

The applicant established standing because the application falls within section 12(2) of the ELRC Act, which contemplates strategic or public interest litigation.

Reasoning

The 1st respondent argued that no employer-employee relationship existed and that the applicant was a busy body. The Court found that position inconsistent with section 12(2) of the ELRC Act, which allows applications lodged by or against various parties including any interested citizen, and held the Supreme Court's holding prevails over authorities requiring an employer-employee relationship.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • The jurisdiction of the ELRC is limited in terms of the types of disputes and the parties as per section 12(2) of the ELRC Act
  • Section 12(2) of the ELRC Act contemplates and institutes strategic or public interest litigation, allowing standing beyond direct employer-employee relationships

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection is dismissed with costs in the cause
  2. 2.Parties to take directions for further steps towards the expeditious hearing and determination of the petition

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(a) of the Constitution and Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act No. 18 of 2014

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

In conclusion, the preliminary objection is hereby dismissed with costs in the cause and parties to take directions for further steps towards the expeditious hearing and determination of the petition.
p. 4Final orders - dismissal of preliminary objection
The subject matter falls within the Court’s jurisdiction and the applicant has established standing, accordingly.
p. 4Jurisdiction and standing
However, that position is obviously inconsistent with the quoted subsection 12 (2) of the Act and the Supreme Court holding prevails.
p. 4Rejection of employer-employee relationship requirement

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v Board of Directors, Agriculture & Food Authority & 3 others; Gikonyo (Nuts and Oil Crops Directorate) & 6 others (Interested Parties); Kiume (Exparte Applicant) (Judicial Review Application E027 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 2701 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Judicial Review Application (ELRC, Nairobi). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/2701/eng@2024-10-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.