Kenya Union of Commerial Food and Allied Workers v Linco Stores Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E021 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2762 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court ruled that joining a trade union after dismissal does not bar the union from suing, and employers must prove misconduct with evidence.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Locus standi of a trade union whose member joined after dismissal
The Claimant had locus standi; section 22 ELRC Act sets no membership-timing condition
Section 22 of the ELRC Act permits representation by an office bearer or official of a party's trade union without conditions on when membership began. There was unrebutted evidence the grievant was a member of the Claimant union at the time of suit, so the Claimant could sue on his behalf, consistent with the Court of Appeal decision in Modern Soap Factory v Kenya Shoe and Leather Workers Union.
Whether the summary dismissal was unfair and unlawful
The dismissal was unfair and unlawful within section 45 of the Employment Act
Sections 45, 41 and 43 require the employer to prove a valid and fair reason and fair procedure. The respondent alleged misappropriation of customer payments but produced no documentary evidence substantiating the misconduct and no minutes or other proof of a hearing. The grievant denied wrongdoing. The burden of proof resting on the employer was not discharged, so the summary dismissal was unfair.
Reliefs: compensation, notice pay, leave and underpayment
Grievant awarded 12 months' compensation, one month's notice pay, 37 leave days pay and underpayment for 36 months, but judgment entered at the pleaded total of Kshs.611,080.50
Section 49(1) compensation was warranted given 17 years of service, employer's failure to prove misconduct, and skewed procedure. Leave of 63 days less 26 utilised left 37 days payable on the minimum wage of Kshs.21,418.50. Underpayment of Kshs.9,418.50 for 36 months was proved by bank statements. House allowance assessment exceeded the pleaded sum, but parties are bound by pleadings, so judgment entered at the pleaded total.
Legal principles established
#- Section 22 of the ELRC Act imposes no condition as to the timing within which an employee must become a member of a trade union before union representation
- The employer bears the burden of proving valid reasons for termination and fair procedure; failure to produce evidence renders dismissal unfair
Court orders
#- 1.Judgment entered for the claimant in the sum of Kshs.611,080.50
- 2.The award is less statutory deductions
- 3.The claimant is awarded costs of the suit plus interest at court rates from the date of this judgment
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the ELRC Act (Section 22 on representation cited); Employment Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Kenya Union of Commerial Food and Allied Workers v Linco Stores Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E021 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2762 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Cause (Employment and Labour Relations) – not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/2762/eng@2024-11-08
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.