Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedPetition dated 12th August 2024

Kenya Union of Clinical Officers v Clerk of the County Assembly, County Government of Kisii & 2 others (Petition E028 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 2854 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
20 November 2024
3,998 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment and Labour Relations Court upheld Kisii's power to create its hospital corporation and dismissed the clinical officers' union challenge with costs.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioner, a trade union representing Clinical Officers, filed a Petition and Notice of Motion dated 12th August 2024 seeking declarations that the Kisii Teaching and Referral Hospital Act 2024 (and the Bill preceding it) was unconstitutional, that the Respondents had no power to establish the 3rd Respondent as a State Corporation, that recruitment undertaken by the 3rd Respondent was unlawful, and an order quashing the employment of its members, alleging contravention of Article 47(1) of the Constitution, Section 4(3) of the Fair Administrative Action Act, and absence of public participation. The 1st Respondent (Kisii County Assembly) and the 2nd and 3rd Respondents opposed, contending the Petition was misconceived, that the Act establishes a County Corporation rather than a State Corporation, and that extensive public participation was undertaken, including an advertisement on 6th April 2024 and a forum at Kisii Cultural Hall on 16th April 2024. The Court distilled three issues: constitutionality of the Act, legality of the recruitment, and entitlement to reliefs. It held that Articles 174, 175, 176, 185 and 186 read with the County Governments Act empower County Assemblies to legislate on devolved health functions; that public participation was extensive and documented; and that the Act creates a County Corporation, not a State Corporation. Finding no demonstrated constitutional infringement and the recruitment lawful under the Act, the Court dismissed both the application and the Petition as misplaced, misconceived and an abuse of process, with costs to the Respondents.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the Kisii Teaching and Referral Hospital Act 2024 is illegal and unconstitutional
  2. 2.Whether the recruitment done by the 3rd Respondent is legal
  3. 3.Whether the Petitioner/Applicant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Key legal issues

#
01

Constitutionality of the Kisii Teaching and Referral Hospital Act 2024

Holding

The Act is legal, lawful and constitutional; it was subjected to extensive public participation and falls within the County Assembly's legislative competence

Reasoning

The Court reviewed Articles 174, 175, 176, 185 and 186 and the County Governments Act and found that County Assemblies may legislate on devolved functions under the Fourth Schedule. Public participation was held out on 6th April 2024 and conducted on 16th April 2024 at Kisii Cultural Hall, with a Select Committee report tabled, debated and the Bill passed. The Petitioner failed to demonstrate any infringement.

p. 7
02

Character of the entity established by the Act

Holding

The Act establishes a County Corporation within the meaning of the Kisii County Corporation Act 2024, not a State Corporation

Reasoning

The Court accepted the Respondents' submission distinguishing County Corporations from State Corporations, the former being county government entities and the latter national government bodies. The legislation was therefore within the County Assembly's power and no attempt to create a State Corporation at county level was found.

p. 7
03

Legality of recruitment by the 3rd Respondent

Holding

Recruitment was lawful as it was conducted in accordance with the Act, and no constitutional infringement was demonstrated

Reasoning

Having found the Act constitutional, the Court held there could be no illegality in recruitment done under it. The Petitioner adduced no evidence of a single constitutional infringement in the enactment or subsequent actions, and its failure to plead and prove allegations with precision weakened its case.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • County Governments, through their County Assemblies, have legislative authority under Articles 174, 175, 176, 185 and 186 and the County Governments Act to enact laws necessary for or incidental to the performance of devolved functions under the Fourth Schedule
  • A County Assembly may establish a County Corporation as a county entity, distinct from a State Corporation under national government

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Dismissal of the Petitioner's application dated 12th August 2024
  2. 2.Dismissal of the Petition dated 12th August 2024
  3. 3.Costs of the application and Petition to the Respondents

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Constitution of Kenya 2010, Articles 174, 175, 176, 185 and 186; County Governments Act

Relief refused

#

Declaration that the Kisii Teaching and Referral Hospital Bill 2024 is unconstitutional

The Act was lawfully enacted following public participation and establishes a County Corporation, not a State Corporation

p. 8

Declaration that the Respondents had no power to establish the 3rd Respondent as a State Corporation

The Act creates a County Corporation under the Kisii County Corporation Act 2024, a county entity, not a national government outfit

p. 7

Declarations on the unlawfulness of recruitment/employment and quashing of employment of the Petitioner's members

No constitutional infringement was demonstrated; recruitment was in accordance with the Act

p. 8

Costs

Costs of the application and the Petition awarded to the Respondents

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

The Court finds it fit to dismiss the application and the Petition with costs to the Respondents.
p. 8Disposition - dismissal of application and Petition
The above demonstrates that the Kisii Teaching and Referral Hospital Act of 2024 was legally and lawfully enacted and it is not unconstitutional.
p. 8Constitutionality of the county legislation
there is no attempt to create a state corporation at the County but instead a County Corporation which is a county entity and not a national government outfit
p. 7Distinction between County Corporation and State Corporation
Both are misplaced, misconceived and an abuse of the Court process granted the fact the Petitioner was aware of the public participation that was undertaken
p. 8Abuse of court process

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

Numbered paragraphs 1-3 at the start of the judgment are blank; the judgment opens without any introductory narrative before setting out the application

minor

The parties and cause title are not reproduced in the judgment text; the Petitioner's full name is never stated in the body of the judgment

minor

The judgment appears to dispose of the Notice of Motion together with the main Petition on the merits, although the motion sought final declarations at what is described as an interim stage

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Union of Clinical Officers v Clerk of the County Assembly, County Government of Kisii & 2 others (Petition E028 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 2854 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Petition dated 12th August 2024. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/2854/eng@2024-11-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.