Thuo & 4 others v Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers; National Hospital Insurance Fund & another (Interested Parties) (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E049 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 279 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Employment Court struck out a petition against a union dues increase, ruling aggrieved members must appeal within 30 days under the Labour Relations Act, not file petitions.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Compliance with section 27(4) of the Labour Relations Act in amending the union constitution
The court found the union followed the law in amending its constitution; the Registrar gazetted the notice and published invitations for objections in newspapers, and no effective objection was raised
The National Delegates Conference of 20th February 2021 approved the amendments by vote, notice was given to the Registrar on 26/2/2021, and the Registrar gazetted the amendment on 23/4/2021 with a 21-day objection window, also placing notices in newspapers. The court held the petitioners' objection went to the visibility of the newspaper notices, but found the union had otherwise followed the legal process.
Whether the court can interfere with the union's determination of its dues
The court cannot interfere with the running of the union or vary the union dues, since the union, through its delegates, agreed on them; members who feel oppressed have the right to leave the union
Under Article 41(4) every trade union has the right to determine its own administration, programmes and activities. The delegates' conference vote on the dues increase was an internal union decision that the court cannot vary. The corollary of the freedom to join a union is the freedom not to participate, so aggrieved members may exit the union rather than have dues judicially rewritten.
Correct procedural vehicle for challenging a Registrar's decision
The proper remedy is an appeal to the Industrial Court within thirty days under section 30 of the Labour Relations Act; a petition was irregular
Section 30 of the Labour Relations Act provides that any person aggrieved by a decision of the Registrar made under the Act may appeal to the Industrial Court within thirty days. The petitioners were aggrieved by the decision to amend the union's constitution and thus had a right to come to court, but by way of appeal, not a constitutional petition. Their choice of a petition was therefore irregular and the petition was struck out.
Legal principles established
#- A person aggrieved by a decision of the Registrar of Trade Unions must appeal to the Industrial Court within thirty days under section 30 of the Labour Relations Act, and may not instead mount a constitutional petition
- A trade union has the constitutional right under Article 41(4) to determine its own administration, programmes and activities, including its dues, but must engage its membership before making drastic measures
Court orders
#- 1.The petition is struck out
- 2.No orders as to costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Articles 22(2)(b) and (c), 23, 40, 41 and 47 of the Constitution of Kenya; Labour Relations Act, 2007 (section 30)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Thuo & 4 others v Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers; National Hospital Insurance Fund & another (Interested Parties) (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E049 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 279 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Petition dated 13th March 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/279/eng@2025-02-06
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.