Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2025] KEELRC 2993 (KLR)

Kimuyu v Unik Driving School (Appeal E258 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 2993 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
30 October 2025
2,004 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that an employee who abandons their job is not automatically fired — the employer must formally end the employment or face an unfair termination claim.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal from the judgment of the magistrate's court at Mombasa (CMELRC No. E757 of 2023, delivered 22 November 2024) which had dismissed a driving instructor's claim for terminal dues. The appellant, employed at Ksh. 17,000 monthly, claimed he was verbally terminated on 17 March 2023 after 9 years' service and sought notice pay, severance pay, house allowances and 12 months' compensation for unfair termination. The respondent contended he absconded and terminated his own contract, citing a poor disciplinary record including warnings for soliciting money from students, absenteeism, littering and causing an accident. The respondent also objected that the Record of Appeal was filed out of time. Allowing the appeal in part, the court held that desertion cannot end a contract of service until the employer acts on it; the respondent took no disciplinary action and issued no formal termination, so the employment was unfairly terminated without adherence to sections 35, 41 or 44 of the Employment Act. The appellant received notice pay of Ksh. 17,000 and minimum compensation of one month's pay (Ksh. 17,000), subject to statutory deductions under section 49(2), because his poor work record and unchallenged evidence of new employment disentitled him to more. Severance pay was refused (accrues only on redundancy) and the house allowance claim failed as wages were consolidated and the claim exceeded the 12-month limitation for continuing injuries under section 90. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the appellant was unfairly terminated or deserted duty

Holding

The appellant's claim of verbal dismissal was correct because the respondent never took disciplinary action nor formally terminated the employment

Reasoning

The court adopted authorities holding that desertion is a unilateral act that cannot end a contract until the employer acts on it. The respondent took no disciplinary action and issued no formal termination, leaving the appellant 'at large'. Without adhering to sections 35, 41 or 44 of the Act, the termination was unfair.

p. 4
02

Entitlement to notice pay

Holding

The appellant was entitled to notice pay of Ksh. 17,000

Reasoning

Having found the termination unfair and without notice under sections 35, 41 or 44 of the Act, the court awarded one month's salary as notice pay based on the appellant's monthly wage of Ksh. 17,000.

p. 4
03

Assessment of compensation for unfair termination

Holding

Only minimum compensation of one month's pay (Ksh. 17,000) awarded due to the appellant's poor work record and unchallenged evidence he secured new employment

Reasoning

Under section 45(5) of the Act, the court must consider the employee's work record. The appellant had multiple warnings for absenteeism, soliciting money from students and causing an accident. Awarding more would reward gross misconduct.

p. 4
04

Claim for house allowances

Holding

Claim for house allowances failed as the wage was consolidated and above minimum wage, and the claim was time-barred under section 90

Reasoning

The letter of employment was not filed to show house allowance was not consolidated; the Ksh. 17,000 wage exceeded the Mombasa minimum wage. Further, house allowance is a continuing injury claimable within 12 months of cessation; the suit filed 22 November 2023 exceeded that period.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Desertion cannot bring a contract of service to closure until the employer acts on it by formally terminating the employment
  • Where an employee abandons employment, the employer must invoke section 18(5)(b) of the Employment Act and issue written notice served upon the labour officer
  • An employee's poor work record must be taken into account in assessing compensation for unfair termination under section 45(5)

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the appellant's employment was terminated unfairly
  2. 2.Award of notice pay of Ksh. 17,000
  3. 3.Award of compensation of Ksh. 17,000 (one month's pay) to be subjected to statutory deductions under section 49(2) of the Employment Act
  4. 4.Each party to bear its costs for the appeal and the trial court
On appeal from
Magistrates' Court (ELRC), Mombasa
CMELRC No. E757 of 2023
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal under the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kimuyu v Unik Driving School (Appeal E258 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 2993 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/2993/eng@2025-10-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.