Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedAppeal No. E189 of 2025

Medalion Steakhouse Limited v Francis Musyoka Samuel

Employment and Labour Relations Court
22 September 2026
2,910 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed that employees are owed leave, overtime and house allowance dues even when their dismissal was fair or they resigned.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Employment and Labour Relations Court (Appeals Division, Abuodha Jorum Nelson, J) dismissed an appeal by Medalion Steakhouse Limited against a judgment of Hon. A.N Ogonda (SPM) in Milimani MCELRC No. E2203 of 2023, which had found that the respondent, Francis Musyoka Samuel, was not unfairly terminated (the separation being cordial) but awarded him terminal dues of Kshs 892,707.49 comprising leave encashment, house allowance, public holidays worked and overtime, plus a certificate of service. The appellant's eight grounds were consolidated into a single issue: whether the trial court erred in awarding terminal dues despite dismissing the unfair termination claim. The court held that leave, house allowance, public holidays and overtime are statutory dues payable irrespective of how employment ended. It further held that the trial court misapplied section 90 of the Employment Act by capping the awards at three years: since the respondent resigned in June 2023 and filed suit in December 2023, within 12 months of cessation, the continuing-injury doctrine allowed claims over the full 4 years and 9 months of employment, following the Court of Appeal's decision in The German School Society v Ohany. The employer's failure to issue a written contract or produce attendance registers, muster rolls or records under sections 9, 10, 31 and 74 of the Employment Act left the respondent's allegations uncontroverted. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the respondent, and the awards were varied upward to the full employment period, totalling Kshs 1,915,341.88.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the trial court erred by awarding the Respondent his terminal dues despite dismissing the claim for unfair termination

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether terminal dues can be awarded where the claim for unfair termination is dismissed

Holding

Yes; leave, house allowance, public holidays and overtime are statutory dues awardable irrespective of how employment ended.

Reasoning

The court held that dues awardable to an employee do not depend on the fairness of termination. Even where separation is cordial or by resignation, statutory dues remain payable. The trial court was therefore correct to dismiss the unfair termination claim yet award terminal dues.

p. 9
02

Whether the trial court's capping of awards at three years under section 90 of the Employment Act was correct

Holding

No; the capping was a wrong interpretation. Claims filed within 12 months of cessation are not limited to three years.

Reasoning

Section 90 requires continuing-injury claims to be filed within 12 months of cessation of employment. The Respondent resigned in June 2023 and filed in December 2023, within time. The claims could therefore cover the full 4 years 9 months of employment, following the German School Society decision on continuing wrongs.

p. 11
03

Burden of proof on leave, house allowance, overtime and public holidays

Holding

The employer bore the burden to produce records and a written contract; failing that, the employee's allegations stood uncontroverted.

Reasoning

Sections 9, 10(6) and (7), 31 and 74 of the Employment Act obliged the employer to keep and produce records and to issue a written contract showing consolidated salary. The Appellant produced no attendance registers, muster roll or written contract, so the trial court's findings on unpaid leave, house allowance, overtime and public holidays were upheld.

p. 12

Legal principles established

#
  • Terminal dues such as leave, house allowance, public holidays and overtime are statutory dues payable to an employee irrespective of whether the termination was fair or unfair, or whether the employee resigned.
  • Under section 90 of the Employment Act, a claim based on continuing injuries must be filed within 12 months of cessation of employment, and if so filed, is not limited to the three years preceding dismissal.
  • Where an employer fails to reduce the contract into writing and fails to produce employment records under sections 9, 10(6) and (7) and 74 of the Employment Act, allegations of unpaid leave, unconsolidated salary and overtime stand uncontroverted.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal dismissed with costs to the Respondent
  2. 2.Awards capped at three years by the trial court varied to the period worked of 4 years and 9 months
  3. 3.Leave pay Kshs 511,909.06/=
  4. 4.Overtime pay Kshs 1,024,069/=
  5. 5.House allowance Kshs 234,070.52/=
  6. 6.Public Holidays worked Kshs 145,293.30/=
  7. 7.Total award Kshs 1,915,341.88/=

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

Wrote the judgment

On appeal from
Magistrates' Court (Milimani, ELRC)
Milimani MCELRC No. E2203 of 2023
Jurisdiction invoked
First appellate jurisdiction over the subordinate court's judgment (Employment and Labour Relations Court Appeals Division)

Relief refused

#

Setting aside of the trial court's judgment and dismissal of the Respondent's claim with costs

The court found terminal dues are payable irrespective of the manner of separation and the appeal lacked merit

p. 13

Costs

Appeal dismissed with costs to the Respondent

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

In the upshot the Appeal is found unmerited and is hereby dismissed with costs to the Respondent while varying the awards made by the trial court which were capped at three years to the period worked of 4 years and 9 months
p. 13Disposition
The employment courts have repeatedly held that those terminal dues are payable even if the termination was fair or unfair as these dues are an employee’s statutory dues.
p. 9Terminal dues payable regardless of manner of separation
The courts have in a number of cases clarified this section of the law to mean that for continuing injuries what the Claimant needs to do is file their claim 12 months after cessation of employment in order to claim the continuing injuries irrespective of the number of years it has taken.
p. 10Section 90 Employment Act - continuing injuries
This being a first appeal, we are reminded of our primary role as a first appellate court namely, to re-evaluate, re-assess and reanalyze the extracts on the record and then determine whether the conclusions reached by the learned trial Judge are to stand or not and give reasons either way
p. 8Duty of first appellate court

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

Judgment dated 22nd September 2026 but appeal filed June 2025 and submissions dated January and March 2026; dates internally consistent but the memorandum of appeal is dated 11th June 2025, one month after the judgment appealed.

minor

Overtime rate stated as '1.5%' where 150% is evidently meant.

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Medalion Steakhouse Limited v Francis Musyoka Samuel", Case Analysis (2026). Appeal No. E189 of 2025. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2026/2506/eng@2026-09-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.