Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedPetition E135 of 2026· [2026] KEELRC 2670 (KLR)

Blair & another v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Investments Trade and Industry & 3 others

Employment and Labour Relations Court
30 September 2026
1,129 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court struck out a public interest challenge to Anti-Counterfeit Authority appointments, ruling such cases now belong in the High Court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by M Mbarũ, J of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi determines the respondents' notices of preliminary objection dated 17 July 2026 in a petition challenging the appointment of the chairperson and a member of the Board of Directors of the Anti-Counterfeit Authority. The respondents objected that the ELRC lacked jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(a) of the Constitution and section 12 of the ELRC Act, and that the petitioners, who described themselves as acting in the public interest, lacked locus standi. They relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital v Gikenyi [2026] KESC 50, which removed public interest litigation from the ELRC's purview, and sought striking out with costs. The petitioners conceded the Supreme Court judgment was delivered on 3 June 2026, after filing, but argued the new jurisdictional position should not apply retrospectively, citing the ELRC's prior practice of hearing public interest suits. The court held it is bound by superior court jurisprudence, accepted that the petitioners were not at fault for approaching the ELRC before the Supreme Court's ruling, but allowed the objections. The petition and consolidated ELRC JR No. E029 of 2026 were struck out, with the petitioners directed to revert to the High Court in JR No. E028 of 2026 for appropriate directions. The court declined costs, reasoning that awarding them would defeat the essence of public interest litigation, and directed the ELRC Registrar to place the file before the High Court's Judicial Review Division immediately.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELRC over public interest litigation

Holding

The Supreme Court's decision in Moi Teaching & Referral Hospital v Gikenyi binds the ELRC and removes public interest litigation from its jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(a) read with Article 165(5)(b)

Reasoning

The court is bound by superior court jurisprudence. The Supreme Court addressed the ELRC's jurisdiction under section 12 of the ELRC Act and Article 162(2)(a), distinguishing matters for the High Court from matters for the ELRC and removing public interest litigation from the latter. The petitioners, describing themselves as acting in the public interest, therefore fall outside the categories of persons who may approach the ELRC.

p. 2
02

Retrospective application of the Supreme Court's jurisdictional ruling

Holding

The petitioners should not be faulted for approaching the ELRC before the Supreme Court judgment, but the objection nonetheless succeeds on the law as it now stands

Reasoning

The petitioners conceded the Moi Teaching & Referral Hospital judgment was delivered on 3 June 2026, after filing. The court accepted their submissions that they acted correctly at the time, but being bound by the superior court, allowed the objections, striking out the petition while shielding them from costs and directing reversion to the High Court.

p. 2
03

Locus standi of public interest litigants before the ELRC

Holding

Petitioners acting in the public interest lack locus standi before the ELRC, which goes to jurisdiction

Reasoning

Relying on Legal Advice Centre t/a Kituo Cha Sheria and Mukisa Biscuit, the respondents argued locus standi is a pure point of law going to jurisdiction. The petitioners described themselves as acting in the public interest and pleaded no personal, professional, commercial or constitutional interest affected by the appointments, removing the court's jurisdiction.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Locus standi goes directly to whether the court has jurisdiction to hear a matter
  • Public interest litigation falls outside the ELRC's jurisdiction and must be brought in the High Court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objections dated 17 July 2026 are allowed to the extent that the petition herein and JR No. E029 of 2026, as consolidated, are struck out
  2. 2.The petitioners/applicants shall revert to the High Court, JR No. E028 of 2026 for appropriate directions
  3. 3.No orders on costs
  4. 4.The Hon. Registrar, ELRC, to place the file before the Registrar, High Court, immediately, for placement before the Presiding Judge, Judicial Review Division, for appropriate directions

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)(a)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 165(3)(b) and (d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 165(5)(b)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court ActSection 12

Cases cited (5)

  • Moi Teaching & Referral Hospital & 3 others v Dr Magare Gkenyi & 76 others [2026]
    Petition No. E030 as consolidated with E033 of 2025

    Public law contests over appointments are for the High Court under Article 165(3)(b) and (d)

  • Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital & 3 others v Gikenyi & 74 others
    [2026] KESC 50 (KLR)

    ELRC jurisdiction under section 12; public interest litigation removed to the High Court

  • Legal Advice Centre t/a Kituo Cha Sheria v Attorney General
    [2024] KESC 15 [KLR]

    Locus standi goes directly to whether the court has jurisdiction

  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd
    [1969] EA

    Definition of a pure point of law

  • Okiya Omtatah Okoiti v President of Kenya & 9 others
    [2016] KEELRC 1845 (KLR)

    ELRC's former routine exercise of jurisdiction over public interest litigation

Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(a) of the Constitution and Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Blair & another v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Investments Trade and Industry & 3 others", Case Analysis (2026). Petition E135 of 2026. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2026/2670/eng@2026-09-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.