Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedELRC Cause No. E015 of 2024

John Kennedy Matete v The Vice Chancellor (Administration) Kenyatta University & another

Employment & Labour Relations Court of Kenya
7 October 2026
4,008 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyatta University employee won temporary protection from eviction pending appeal, but only if he keeps paying rent and clears all arrears within 60 days.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling by Wasilwa J of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi on a Notice of Motion dated 17th March 2026 by John Kennedy Matete, a former employee of Kenyatta University, seeking stay of execution and injunctive relief restraining the Respondents from proclaiming, attaching, levying distress or evicting him from House No. 12 Uganda Crescent pending his appeal (Civil Appeal No. E964 of 2025) against the judgment of Rutto J of 25th July 2025 dismissing his employment claim. The Applicant, a person with disabilities, complained of a unilateral deduction of Kshs. 380,837 from his gratuity and a notice to offset rent arrears. The Respondents opposed, arguing material non-disclosure of paragraph 54 of the judgment (which found the rent arrears were settled from sums due to him with his knowledge), inordinate delay of eight months, failure to meet the Order 42 Rule 6(2) conditions, prior refusal of identical relief by the Rent Restriction Tribunal, and that the Court was functus officio. The court, in a brief ruling, granted the stay conditionally: the Applicant must continue paying rent as it falls due and clear all accrued arrears within 60 days, failing which the stay stands vacated. Costs were ordered to abide the outcome of the appeal. The court did not expressly rule on the jurisdictional objections.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory if the restraining orders are not granted
  2. 2.Whether the Applicant has met the threshold for grant of a temporary injunction
  3. 3.Who bears the costs

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether to grant stay/injunction pending appeal against eviction and distress for rent arrears

Holding

Stay granted conditionally to avoid rendering the appeal nugatory, conditioned on payment of rent and arrears within 60 days

Reasoning

The court noted the applicant had filed an appeal against the judgment of Rutto J dismissing his claim. To preserve the substratum of the appeal, the court granted stay but conditioned it on the applicant continuing to pay rent and clearing accrued arrears, with 60 days to pay, failing which the stay would be vacated.

p. 19

Legal principles established

#
  • A stay of a court's judgment pending appeal may be granted conditionally, requiring the applicant to keep paying rent and clear accrued arrears, failing which the stay lapses

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay orders granted restraining the Respondents from evicting the Applicant from House No. 12 Uganda Crescent pending appeal, on condition that the Applicant continues to pay rent when due and pays all accrued rent arrears
  2. 2.Applicant given 60 days to pay off the arrears, in default of which the stay orders stand vacated
  3. 3.Costs to abide the outcome of the appeal

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent jurisdiction of the ELRC to grant stay of its own judgment pending appeal (Order 42 Rule 6(2) Civil Procedure Rules applied mutatis mutandis)

Relief refused

#

Unconditional stay/injunction without payment of arrears

Stay granted only conditionally on continued payment of rent and clearance of arrears

p. 19

Costs

Costs to abide the outcome of the appeal

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

In order to avoid a situation where the appeal if it succeeds shall be rendered nugatory, I will allow the stay orders only on condition that the applicant continues to pay rent in house no 12 Uganda Crescent when due and all rent arrears that have accrued pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
p. 19conditional stay pending appeal
The applicant has 60 days to pay off as expected and in default the stay orders will stand vacated. Costs to abide the outcome of the appeal.
p. 19final orders and costs

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

Application dated 17th March 2026 but supporting affidavit sworn same date while replying affidavit sworn 22nd June 2026 and Tribunal ruling 9th April 2026 - chronology internally consistent but dates appear anomalous relative to cause number year

minor

Judgment described as delivered by Rutto J in the same cause now before Wasilwa J

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "John Kennedy Matete v The Vice Chancellor (Administration) Kenyatta University & another", Case Analysis (2026). ELRC Cause No. E015 of 2024. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2026/2768/eng@2026-10-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.