Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedMiscellaneous Application No. E036 of 2026

Evans Nyakundi Momanyi v Consolidated Human Resource Solutions Limited

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
8 October 2026
780 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court excused a worker's mistaken deadline calculation, giving him 14 days to appeal, but made him pay costs for the avoidable application.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant sought leave under Rule 12 of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules to file an appeal out of time against a judgment delivered on 30 June 2026 in Mavoko MCELRC No. E247 of 2025, explaining a short delay by his inability to afford legal fees immediately. The respondent opposed, arguing the application was an abuse of process, that no evidence of impecuniosity was tendered, and that lack of fees did not prevent timely filing of a Memorandum of Appeal. The court held that time under Rule 12 is computed as under Order 50 of the Civil Procedure Rules, excluding weekends, public holidays and the court recess, and that the applicant laboured under a mistaken belief that a calendar month applied. Finding the mistake excusable and noting the applicant's proactive filing and right to be heard on appeal, the court allowed the application, giving the applicant 14 days to file the appeal including the Record of Appeal. However, because the proceedings would have been avoided with proper legal advice, the applicant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs assessed at Kshs. 5,000. The ruling is notable for its computation analysis but contains internal inconsistencies in its date calculations and does not engage with the respondent's submission that Rule 18 governs extensions of time.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file his appeal out of time
  2. 2.Whether the delay in filing the appeal is excusable

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the applicant's delay in filing the appeal should be excused

Holding

The delay was excusable, arising from a mistaken belief that a calendar month applied when computing the 30-day period; the applicant was granted 14 days to file the appeal.

Reasoning

The court found the applicant's mistaken computation of time excusable, noting his proactive filing of the application and his right to be heard on appeal. However, it criticised the proceedings as avoidable had the applicant been properly advised on the ELRC Rules and Civil Procedure Rules, and penalised him in costs.

p. 3
02

Computation of the 30-day period for filing an appeal under Rule 12 of the ELRC Rules

Holding

Time is computed excluding weekends, public holidays and the court recess, in line with Order 50 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Reasoning

The court held that the ELRC Rules' time tabulation mirrors Order 50 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which excludes weekends, public holidays and court recess. A proper calculation from 30 June showed the 30 days lapsing on 25 September 2026, or 12 August 2026 even if the recess were removed.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • In calculating time under the ELRC Rules, weekends, public holidays and the court recess are excluded, as under Order 50 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The applicant has 14 days within which to file his Appeal, including the Record of Appeal, as required under Rule 12 of the ELRC Rules
  2. 2.The applicant shall pay the respondent's costs, assessed at Ksh. 5,000

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

On appeal from
Mavoko Magistrates' Court (ELRC)
Mavoko MCELRC No. E247 of 2025
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 17 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act read with Rule 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

Given the mistake, which the court finds excusable in the circumstances, and the applicant's proactive filing of these proceedings, time has since lapsed. The applicant will not be penalised.
p. 3extension of time - excusable delay
The applicant's pursuit of justice and his right to be heard on appeal are justified.
p. 3right to be heard on appeal
Accordingly, the application dated 4 August 2026 analysed; the applicant has 14 days within which to file his Appeal, including the Record of Appeal, as required under Rule 12 of the ELRC Rules.
p. 3final orders

Issues in the judgment

#
material

Timeline contradiction: application filed 4 August 2026 yet court computes lapse at 25 September 2026 and treats time as lapsed.

minor

Inconsistent case number for the judgment appealed from.

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Evans Nyakundi Momanyi v Consolidated Human Resource Solutions Limited", Case Analysis (2026). Miscellaneous Application No. E036 of 2026. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2026/2779/eng@2026-10-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.