Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
MagistratePartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment

Kigen & 3 others v Sabatia Farmers Co-operative Society Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E059 of 2021) [2025] KEMC 75 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
29 April 2025
5,018 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~20 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court awarded farm workers underpayments and notice pay, but part of their claims failed because they filed too late.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Four former and current employees of Sabatia Farmers' Co-operative Society Ltd sued for underpayments of salaries, gratuity disclosure, salary balances, notice pay for unilateral conversion of permanent terms to contract terms, deployment on light duties per medical recommendations, and issuance of a certificate of service. The Respondent denied the claims and sought dismissal with costs. The court first applied Section 90 of the Employment Act, holding that the 1st Claimant's underpayment claim, lodged two years and seven months after he ceased working in July 2018, was time-barred as a continuing injury claim. However, his claim for full disclosure of gratuity computation succeeded because the Respondent paid Kshs.139,657.50 without explaining how the figure was reached; the certificate of service claim was moot as the certificate had been issued. The court held that the Respondent, being in the agricultural industry, was governed by the Regulations of Wages (Agricultural Industry) Order rather than the General Order, but still found the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Claimants underpaid and awarded 36 months' underpayment each. Salary balances for February and March 2020 were awarded as the employer failed to prove payment. Claims for light duties failed for want of conclusive medical recommendations, and gratuity claims by still-serving claimants were refused. Claims for notice pay for unilateral conversion of terms succeeded, no consultation records having been produced. The 4th Claimant's prayer for a letter identifying persons alleging she incited farmers was dismissed as trivial under de minimis non curat lex. The suit was partially allowed with costs to the claimants.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether each of the claimants herein is entitled to the claims/reliefs sought
  2. 2.Whether the 1st Claimant's claims (gratuity disclosure, underpayments, certificate of service) are merited
  3. 3.Whether the 2nd Claimant's claims (underpayments, gratuity, salary balances, light duties, notice of conversion of terms) are merited
  4. 4.Whether the 3rd Claimant's claims are merited
  5. 5.Whether the 4th Claimant's claims are merited
  6. 6.Who should bear the costs

Key legal issues

#
01

Limitation of employment claims (1st Claimant)

Holding

The 1st Claimant's underpayment claim was time-barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act

Reasoning

Section 90 requires suits founded on employment contracts to be brought within 3 years, or within 12 months of cessation for continuing injuries. The 1st Claimant ceased work on 9 July 2018 but filed on 6 February 2021, two years and seven months later, so the continuing-injury claim for underpayments could not survive.

p. 4
02

Gratuity disclosure (1st Claimant)

Holding

Claim for full disclosure of gratuity computation succeeded

Reasoning

The letter of appointment entitled the claimant to gratuity at 15 days' basic salary per completed year. The Respondent paid Kshs.139,657.50 but its letters only informed the claimant of the dues without any computation. The Respondent therefore failed to address full disclosure of the gratuity payment and the documents relied upon.

p. 5
03

Applicable minimum wage order (2nd Claimant)

Holding

The Agricultural Industry Order applied, yet the 2nd Claimant was still underpaid

Reasoning

The Respondent carries on business in the agricultural industry, so the Regulations of Wages (Agricultural Industry) Order applied rather than the General Order. Even so, its subsidiary employees' pay fell below the minimum under Gazette Notice No.3 of 2019, and underpayment was computed at Kshs.5,636.30 per month over 36 months.

p. 6
04

Light duties / reasonable accommodation

Holding

Claims for deployment on light duties failed for lack of conclusive medical recommendations

Reasoning

Light duty is undefined in law and left to the parties' contracts. Where an employee falls ill the employer must reasonably accommodate them, but before retiring on medical grounds such steps must be attempted. Here no medical report actually recommended light or alternate duties, so the prayers were misguided and legally untenable.

p. 7
05

Unilateral conversion of permanent terms to contract terms

Holding

Claims for notice pay for conversion of terms succeeded

Reasoning

Changing an employee's terms to their disadvantage without consultation constitutes unfair labour practice contrary to Article 41. The Respondent alleged extensive sensitization of employees but produced no notices, attendance lists, facilitators or minutes, so no consultation was proved and 3 months' notice pay was awarded.

p. 8
06

Salary balances February and March 2020

Holding

Respondent failed to prove payment of salary balances

Reasoning

As employer, the Respondent bore the burden of proving the salaries were paid. No documents or records were produced to that effect, so the 2nd Claimant's claim for the two months' salary balances succeeded on that basis alone.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Claims for salary underpayment, overtime, leave and similar continuing injuries must be commenced within 12 months of cessation under Section 90 of the Employment Act
  • Gratuity is a discretionary gratis payment payable under a contract of service or CBA, distinct from severance pay under Section 40(g) of the Employment Act
  • Employers in the agricultural industry are governed by the Regulations of Wages (Agricultural Industry) Order, not the General Order
  • Unilateral variation of an employment contract without consultation is unlawful, amounts to repudiation and breach, and constitutes unfair labour practice under Article 41
  • Courts will not entertain trivial matters - de minimis non curat lex

Court orders

#
  1. 1.1st Claimant: full disclosure of the gratuity payments year by year and documents relied on in calculating the gratuity
  2. 2.2nd Claimant: underpayments of Kshs. 202,906.80; salary balance of Kshs. 14,472.60; notice pay of Kshs. 20,208.90
  3. 3.3rd Claimant: unpaid salary of Kshs. 33,681.50; salary balance of Kshs. 3,368.15; underpayments of Kshs. 202,906.80
  4. 4.4th Claimant: notice pay of Kshs. 20,208.90; salary balance of Kshs. 6,736; underpayments of Kshs. 202,906.80
  5. 5.All other claims dismissed
  6. 6.Claimants awarded costs of the suit

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and labour relations dispute under Article 41 of the Constitution and the Employment Act

Relief refused

#

1st Claimant: confirmation of registration of gratuity calculations document by the Commissioner of Cooperatives; underpayments of salaries

Underpayment claim caught by the 12-month limitation for continuing injuries; ceasing employment on 9 July 2018, suit filed 6 February 2021

p. 4

1st Claimant: issuance of certificate of service

Certificate of Service already issued and produced in court

p. 5

2nd Claimant: payment of service gratuity and full disclosure of calculations

Employment not terminated; gratuity only payable at end of contract, resignation, retirement or death

p. 6

2nd and 4th Claimants: deployment and allocation of lighter duties per medical recommendations

No conclusive medical report recommending light or alternate duties; claimant herself said she could not work at all; no medical progress report availed

p. 8

4th Claimant: gratuity payment

She is yet to be terminated

p. 9

4th Claimant: official letter indicating persons alleging she was inciting farmers

Trivial, non-justiciable prayer; de minimis non curat lex

p. 9

3rd Claimant: withdrawal of unauthorized medical sick leave and resumption of duties

Claimant free to resume duties as he had not been terminated; no order needed

p. 8

3rd Claimant: balance of salary for October 2019

Not proved in his statement

p. 9

Costs

The claimants to have costs of the suit

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

Each of the Claimant's claim is hereby allowed as follows:
p. 10Final orders - reliefs allowed
All the other claims area hereby dismissed.
p. 10Final orders - dismissal of remaining claims
The claimants to have costs of the suit.
p. 10Final orders - costs
the claim for salary underpayment, overtime, leave, public holidays worked and housing allowance were continuing injuries for purposes of limitation of actions and ought to have been commenced within twelve months from the time of cessation.
p. 4Limitation of continuing-injury claims
In view of the foregoing, I do hereby find the prayer as to deployment and allocation of light duties is unfortunately, misguided, and legally untenable.
p. 8Light duties / reasonable accommodation
Clearly changing the terms of a contract of an employee to his disadvantage constitute unfair labour practice against article 41 of the 2010 Kenya Constitution
p. 8Unilateral variation of contract
De Minimis Non Curat Lex - the law does not govern trifies, matters of little or no value.
p. 9Trivial prayers

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

Judgment appears to confuse the 3rd and 4th Claimants in the conclusion on the 3rd Claimant's claims

material

Internal contradiction in computation of 2nd Claimant's salary balance: computed at Kshs. 13,472.60 in analysis but awarded at Kshs. 14,472.60 in final orders

minor

Contradictory statement that the claim for 3 months' notice pay is both unfounded and legally tenable

minor

Case number and neutral citation are not stated in the judgment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kigen & 3 others v Sabatia Farmers Co-operative Society Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E059 of 2021) [2025] KEMC 75 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2025/75/eng@2025-04-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.