Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

JOHN ONYANGO ODUOR vs REPUBLIC [1983] KECA 87 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Kneller, J.A. Chesoni and Platt, Ag. JJ.A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 91 OF 1983 BETWEEN JOHN ONYANGO ODUOR ……………………………………………..APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC………………………………………………………………..RESPONDENT (Appeal from a sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Kisumu (Schofiedl, J.) dated March 19 1983 in Criminal Case 776 of 1983) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The appellant, who at first did not wish to appear before us but who has appeared has raised no point of law on this second appeal. He was convicted of causing grievous harm contrary to section 234 of the Penal C ode and sentenced to four years' imprisonment, twelve strokes of corporal punishment and five years of police supervision. The appeal concerns facts, very carefully analyzed by the High Court in the light of the findings by the trial court. These was evidence which was properly evaluated by the High Court, upon which the courts below could come to the conclusion, that the Appellant was guilty of the offence charged. The Appellant was held to be recognised by witnesses who knew him. The evidence of the brothers was not necessary. It would have carried the Appellant's identification no further by the production of the sword which the Appellant complains was not produced. The Appellant was arrested sometime after the event because he had left home. All those matters were matters of fact. Consequently the appeal is dismissed against conviction. There is no appeal to this court on sentence. Delivered at Kisumu this 5th day of December, 1983. A.A. KNELLER JUDGE OF APPEAL Z R CHESONI AG JUDGE OF APPEAL H G PLATT AG JUDGE OF APPEAL

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.