Republic of Kenya Court of Appeal, at Nairobi Criminal Appeal No 105 of 1985 Kanyingi versus Republic (Appeal from the High Court at Nairob, Owour J) December 11, 1985, Nyarangi JA, Platt & Gachuhi Ag JJA delivered the following Judgment. This appellant, James Kanyingi, was charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. He was convicted of the lesser offence of Manslaughter contrary to section 202 as read with section 205 of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 6 years. He appeals to this court on sentence. The three grounds of appeal upon which this appeal is presented to this court are at variance with the accepted facts of the case as narrated by the prosecution. The facts were that the appellant, an Administrative Policeman armed with a G3 rifle was guarding the D O’s office at Pumwani on the night of May 5 and 6 1984. Opposite to the D O’s office is a Sports Club 50 yards away where a dance was being held. A disturbance caused by a fellow administrative policeman occurred there at midnight. The appellant went to the aid of his colleague and shot deceased rupturing the heart and intestines. He used excessive force in the circumstances. The deceased died on the way to hospital. Though the appeal is on sentence, we feel that the appellant was lucky to get away with such a light sentence in the circumstances of the case. The sentence cannot be said to be excessive or severe. The learned state counsel supports the sentence. There is no merit in this appeal which we order to be dismissed. Delivered on the December 11, 1985 Nyarangi JA, Platt & Gachuhi Ag JJA
Original judgment
Kanyingi v Republic [1985] KECA 111 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.