REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU (CORAM:NYARANGI, GACHUHI & PLATT JJA: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 25 OF 1987 NYABIND s/o OJAL…………………………APPELLANT V REPUBLIC……………………………..RESPONDENT JUDGMENT In this appeal Mr Nyamori for the appellant very properly has urged every possible point in favour of the appellant . However, Yuanita PW 3 and Rose PW 5 saw the appellant running away form the scene where the deceased collapsed after he was fatally injured. The two who knew the appellant well did corroborate the deceased’s dying declaration that the appellant hit him at the stomach with a stick because they saw the appellant running away with a stick and also saw a swelling on the stomach. The incident took place during broad daylight. The judge considered all the evidence including the testimony of the provincial Psychiatrist. The surgeon who operated the deceased ought to have given evidence as to the injuries on the deceased. The failure to call the surgeon is not in this case fatal because the actual would could be seen and matches the evidence of the postmortem examination. The Minister concerned should be moved to act under subsection (6) of section 166 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Those are the orders of the court. June 17, 1987 NYARANGI, PLATT & GACHUHI JJA
Original judgment
Nyabind s/o Ojal v Republic [1987] KECA 38 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.