Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

PETER KIMANI MWANGI vs KARANJA MUCHINJU [1994] KECA 61 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Muli, Omolo & Tunoi, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 170 OF 1994 BETWEEN PETER KIMANI MWANGI....................................APPLICANT AND KARANJA MUCHINJU.......................................RESPONDENT (Application to strike out Notice of Appeal filed on 31st March, 1994 in an intended appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Ole Keiwua, J.) dated 17th March, 1994 in H.C.C.C. NO. 3924 OF 1989) ****************************** RULING OF THE COURT The Notice of Appeal filed as far back as 24th March, 1994 was not followed by any steps or action to show that an appeal was contemplated. We see no purpose in trying to nurse the Notice of Appeal without seeing any steps having been taken following the filing of Notice of Appeal. Time has expired under the Rules and no useful purpose will be achieved by leaving this Notice of Appeal on the Record. We agree with Mr. Muriithi that there is no option but to strike out the Notice of Appeal filed on 24th December, 1994. Accordingly the Notice of Appeal is hereby struck out with costs to the applicant. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 9th day of December, 1994. M.G. MULI JUDGE OF APPEAL

page 1 of 2

R.S.C. OMOLO JUDGE OF APPEAL P.K. TUNOI JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.